Defending and Modelling Europe: The Visegrad Group Experience

Defending and Modelling Europe: The Visegrad Group Experience
复制标题

捍卫和塑造欧洲:维谢格拉德集团的经验

DOI:
10.21272/sec.2(2).13-18.2018
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
SocioEconomic Challenges
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
A. Trifu
A. Trifu
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Trifu

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在当今世界,唯一拥有自己的机构(超国家性质),在几乎整个欧洲空间的各个方面都有一致的经济政策的经济区域是欧盟。在2014年克罗地亚和2019年英国退出(著名的“英国脱欧”)的最后一波扩张之后,来自外部来源的威胁甚至27个成员国之间的内部紧张局势,欧盟需要凝聚和协调不同的观点,以确保其复杂的经济和社会体系的所有部分和“部分”的功能。在这种情况下,我们认为,进口的作用可以发挥所谓的维谢格勒4或维谢格勒集团匈牙利,捷克共和国,斯洛伐克和波兰,一方面捍卫欧盟的成就,另一方面,报告不足之处,改善规范和法规,有利于所有成员国,如在文件中分析的例子。因此,我们认为,最好是作为对布鲁塞尔全球领导地位的一种制衡,以保持欧洲联盟的凝聚力和平衡发展。甚至该集团的一些国家也采取了被认为是不自由的民主形式的措施,因此导致了欧洲怀疑主义,事实上,它们的经济从吸收欧盟资金中受益匪浅。经济发展和健全的经济基础设施的存在是更好地了解欧洲联盟的事实和现实的前提,并使各国能够有一个有根据的意见和影响欧盟的一般管理。每个人都必须思考和理解成员国当地利益与区域系统需要和打算做什么之间的协调。这就是领导与管理之间的关系。最后,V4正在以其经验支持西巴尔干国家融入欧盟,并推动扩大进程,作为欧盟在该地区影响力和形象的最合适工具。
In the world of today, the sole economic region with its own institutions (of a supra-state nature), with a coherent economic policy in every respect regarding the almost all European Space, is the European Union. After the last wave on enlargement, Croatia in 2014 and the exit of United Kingdom in 2019 (the famous “Brexit”), with threats from external sources and with even home tensions amongst the 27 Mermber States, the EU needs cohesion and harmonization of different points of view, in order to ensure the functionality of all pieces and “parts” of the its complex economic and social system. In this case, we consider that an import role can play so-called The Visegrad 4 or Visegrad Group ‒ Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland, ‒ on the one hand to defend the achievements of the EU, and on the other hand, to report shortcomings and to improve norms and regulations, favorable for all Members, as in the examples analyzed in the paper. Therefore, we consider that is better to be a sort of counterweight to the global leadership of Bruxelles, in order to maintain the cohesion and a balanced development of the European Union. Even some countries of the group have taken measures considered illiberal forms of democracy and, therefore, leading to euroscepticism, in fact their economies have hugely benefited from the absorption of EU funds. The economic development and the existence of a sound economic infrastructure are the premises for a better understanding of the facts and realities in the European Union and allow to the respective country (countries) to have a grounded opinion and influence the general management of the Union. Everyone has to think and understand the co-ordination between the local interests of the Member States and what the Regional system needs and intend to do. Exactly, this is the situation in the relationships between Leadership and Management. In the last place, the V4 is supporting, by its experience, the integration of the West Balkans countries within EU and promoting the enlargement process as the most suitable tool of EU influence and image in the region.