Exploring the feasibility of assessing perceived parental rearing styles in Spanish children with the EMBU.
Exploring the feasibility of assessing perceived parental rearing styles in Spanish children with the EMBU.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/002076409303900105
复制
发表时间：
1993-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Arrindell, W A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Castro, J;Toro, J;Arrindell, W A
关于父母教养方式评价量表（EMBU）-最初是瑞典的一项旨在评估一个人对父母养育行为的回忆的措施-的维度结构的现有数据大多是从成人或青少年中获得的。在本研究中，使用探索性因素分析，试图确定在西班牙样本的7-12岁的儿童（N = 205）的EMBU因子结构。四个因素解释只有24%和25%的总方差的评级的父亲和母亲，分别是不变的父母的性别，进行了解释：情感温暖，拒绝，控制尝试，和青睐的主题。结果相对于相应的量表的内部一致性的可靠性是令人满意的，因为是同质性的数字有关的每一套理论相关的项目。高阶分析的一阶尺寸（母亲和父亲共同）揭示了三个因素解释85%的总方差。控制尝试、护理（拒绝与情感温暖）和有利于受试者。因子衍生（一阶）规模与性别的收件人。所有尺度（拒绝除外）相关性相当大，负，与年龄（中等效应量）指向，如所述，需要考虑到相关的规范，设计和研究的影响，在进一步的调查。一些相似之处和差异，以前与成人和青少年的研究结果进行了简要的定位。
Most of the available data on the dimensional structure underlying the EMBU--an originally Swedish measure designed to assess one's recollections concerning one's parents' rearing behaviour--has been obtained with adults or adolescents. In the present study, using exploratory factor analysis, an attempt was made to determine the EMBU factorial structure in a Spanish sample of children aged 7-12 years (N = 205). Four factors explaining only 24% and 25% of the total variance in the ratings of the fathers and those of the mothers, respectively, and being invariant across parental sex, were interpreted: Emotional Warmth, Rejection, Control Attempts, and Favouring Subject. Results with respect to the internal consistency reliability of the corresponding scales were satisfactory, as were homogeneity figures pertaining to each set of theoretically-related items. Higher-order analyses of the first-order dimensions (mothers and fathers jointly) revealed three factors explaining 85% of the total variance. Control Attempts, Care (Rejection vs. Emotional Warmth), and Favouring Subject. The factorially-derived (first-order) scales were uncorrelated with sex of the recipient. All scales (except Rejection) correlated sizeably, negatively, with age (medium effect size) pointing, as outlined, to the need to take into account the relevant normative, design and research implications in further investigation. Some similarities and differences with findings yielded previously with adults and adolescents are briefly pinpointed.