Thinking through Molds: Metal Flow and Visualizing the Unseen
Thinking through Molds: Metal Flow and Visualizing the Unseen
复制标题
通过模具思考:金属流动和看不见的可视化
DOI:
10.1086/721207
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Smith, Pamela H.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lacey, Andrew;Smith, Pamela H.
No matter how much care was devoted to making a mold, an overly hot fire, a cold wind, or other unexpected occurrences could cause a mold to crack or the molten metal to cool and congeal too quickly, ruining the final cast. All such contingencies had to be visualized and thought through in constructing a mold, a process that involved sourcing and preparing the mold materials, forming the mold, constructing the casting infrastructure around the model (gate, sprues, and vents), arranging (and constructing) the furnace, alloying and “treating” the metal (with fluxes and substances), and, finally, heating and casting the metal. The Italian mine manager and metalworker Vannoccio Biringuccio (ca. 1480–1539) opined that “the greatest labors of both mind and body are required for its [casting] operations in the beginning, middle, and end.” The fact that the behavior of metal within a mold was invisible heightened the urge to open the mold after a pour to see the success of a cast. This moment of metalworking led Biringuccio to note that “the mind is held in suspense and fear regarding the outcome; the spirit is disturbed and continually anxious,” but despite this he concluded that “it is indeed true that these labors are endured with pleasure because they are associated with a certain expectation of novelty, produced by the greatness of art and awaited with desire, particularly since the artificer sees that it is an art pleasing and delightful even to ignorant men. As a result, as if ensnared, he is often unable to leave the place of work.” 3That anxious moment of complete invisibility and uncertainty between pour and reveal in casting metals has led to deep consideration of and extensive experimentation with the factors that influence the flow of metal into a mold. This type of thinking through molds and casting is evident in many documents like Biringuccio’s Pirotechnia (1540) and the aforementioned Ms. Fr. 640. Of the more than nine hundred entries in that latter manuscript, more than a third are devoted to casting, mostly of small items, especially of plants and animals cast from life in plaster and medals cast in earth-filled frame molds. The unknown authorpractitioner called these earths (including plaster) sable (sand) and focused on the trials of sands with significant preoccupation. He used a great variety of metals including gold, silver, copper, and copper alloys like latten and what he calls bronze and metal. He also experimented extensively with tin, lead, and various alloys of the two, as well as alloys derived from available coins. Ms. Fr. 640 is by no means a recipe book, with its observations, first-hand trials, and directives put down in occasionally chaotic order. In fact, its many contradictions, lacunae, and trailing and unfinished passages can sometimes prove to be an advantage over the highly rhetorical polish of some published texts, at least for the historian attempting to visualize a metal worker’s thinking with and through their molds.
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1979
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
P. Theophilus;J. Hawthorne;C. Smith
通讯作者:
C. Smith
影响因子:
0.6
作者:
P. Smith;T. Beentjes
通讯作者:
T. Beentjes