INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support): a new paradigm for translating registry data into clinical practice.
INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support): a new paradigm for translating registry data into clinical practice.
复制标题
INTERMACS(机械辅助循环支持机构间登记处):将登记数据转化为临床实践的新范例。
DOI:
10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.021
复制
发表时间:
2010
影响因子:
24
通讯作者:
J. T. Baldwin
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Marissa A. Miller;K. Ulisney;J. T. Baldwin
fromNHLBI results clearly demonstrated a clinically meaningful survival benefit and an improved quality of life with ventricular assist device therapy in end-stage heart failure patients as compared with those receiving optimal medical management (5). Despite the benefits, the mortality and adverse events associated with device use in the REMATCH trial highlighted the need to understand the implications of the therapy for the intended patient population and to monitor device performance and clinical outcomes closely over time. As device technology evolves, improvements are expected to reduce the risk of adverse events and to improve quality of life in these patients and enhance the potential for recovery in others (6, 7). Because of the nature of MCS devices and the desire to improve outcomes, a registry for patients who receive MCS devices is well justified. The need for such a registry was envisioned almost 2 decades ago when the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommended that NHLBI maintain a registry of MCS device recipients as a “routine aspect of this care”(8). The IOM recognized this need based on patients’ dependence on the devices and the uncertainty of the long-term benefits and drawbacks. The immediate need for such a registry was realized in 2003 by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). At that time, in their decision to cover destination therapy, the CMS required that any patient who received a ventricular assist device as destination therapy should be entered into a nationally audited registry. With the clear and publically disclosed need for a MCS device registry, NHLBI issued a Request for Proposals in 2004 for an Interagency Registry of Mechanical Circulatory Support for End-Stage Heart Failure. The overall expectation of the registry was that it would help to advance the understanding and application of MCS to improve the mortality, morbidity, and health status in patients with advanced heart failure. The result of the solicitation was a competitive contract awarded in May 2005 to the University of Alabama at Birmingham (9) to establish and manage what has become known as the INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support). Since the registry’s launch in June 2006, INTERMACS has become the national registry of patients receiving FDA-approved durable MCS devices to treat advanced heart failure. Specific objectives of INTERMACS include: 1) collecting and disseminating quality data that help to improve patient selection and clinical management of patients receiving MCS devices; 2) advancing the development and regulation of existing and nextgeneration devices; and 3) enabling research into heart failure and recovery (9, 10). As of January 1, 2010, INTERMACS had more than 100 participating hospitals, more than 2,000 patients entered into the registry, and more than 90% data reporting and completeness of forms (11). INTERMACS resulted from the cooperative efforts of MCS clinicians, scientists, manufacturers, and federal partners. The 3 federal partners involved are: 1) the NHLBI, which funds and oversees the registry; 2) the FDA, which regulates MCS devices; and 3) the CMS, which reimburses for MCS device use. The stake holders worked cooperatively to develop standard definitions, data elements, and data collection time points through an iterative process over the first year of the contract. These processes and standards were necessary to assure accurate, timely, and comprehensive data collection, which began in June 2006. As a result, INTERMACS has become a rigorous tool that is well positioned to help develop guidelines and improve clinical practice …
影响因子:
158.5
作者:
Rose, EA;Gelijns, AC;Meier, P
通讯作者:
Meier, P
影响因子:
24
作者:
Lauer,MichaelS;Skarlatos,SoniaI;Bild,DianeE
通讯作者:
Bild,DianeE