Lardil “Case Stacking” and the Timing of Case Assignment
Lardil “Case Stacking” and the Timing of Case Assignment
复制标题
Lardil“案例堆叠”和案例分配的时机
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
N. Richards
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
N. Richards
Lardil（澳大利亚的Tangkic）允许名词出现多格词缀。这种所谓的格堆叠的一个条件是，当新的形态被添加到具有语义上不可解释的格的名词（例如格）时，格被丢弃;相比之下，具有语义上可解释的格的名词（例如工具）可以在格语素之外堆叠更多的形态。我认为，无法解释的情况下，在这些例子中，实际上是分配，后来被淘汰，并制定了一个方法，拼写出来，允许这样的推导发生，其中PF拼写出来和LF拼写出来是分离的。我提供了两个论点，证明格分配和一致等过程是在狭义语法中发生的：一个与有意义和无意义的格之间的区别有关，另一个与Lardil时态一致和各种类型的运动操作之间的相互作用有关。
Abstract. Lardil (Tangkic, Australia) allows nominals to surface with multiple case affixes. One condition on this so-called case stacking is that when new morphology is added to a nominal with a semantically uninterpretable Case (such as accusative), the Case is dropped; a nominal with a semantically interpretable Case (such as instrumental), by contrast, can stack more morphology outside the Case morpheme. I argue that uninterpretable Cases in these examples are in fact assigned and later eliminated, and develop an approach to Spell-out that allows such derivations to take place, in which PF Spell-out and LF Spell-out are dissociated. I offer two arguments that processes like Case assignment and concord take place in the narrow syntax: one has to do with the distinction drawn between meaningful and meaningless Cases, and the other with the interaction between Lardil Tense concord and various types of movement operations.