Do signers think differently? The processing of number parity in deaf participants.

Do signers think differently? The processing of number parity in deaf participants.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70940-7
复制
发表时间:
2004-02-01
期刊:
Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Willmes, Klaus
Willmes, Klaus
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Iversen, Wiebke;Nuerk, Hans-Christoph;Willmes, Klaus

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

讨论了聋人参与者的数字奇偶性加工。数的大小和数的奇偶性似乎是基本的数表示。在这项研究中,我们研究奇偶校验和幅度是如何表示在本地签名。在有符号的面对面交流中,收信人感知到的是发送者所产生的东西的镜像。对20名语前聋的参与者进行了测试。19/1为右/左优势。参与者被指示通过按下两个响应键之一来决定所呈现的数字是偶数还是奇数。给出了一位阿拉伯数字。两个实验部分,平衡的参与者和之前的12个培训试验,不同的奇偶性,以响应手分配实现。结果表明,数量表征(SNARC效应)和语义词汇都影响聋人阿拉伯数字奇偶性判断。我们没有观察到语言对数字幅度表征的特定影响,因为SNARC效应的方向与听力人群相同。总之,这些研究结果表明,即使在一个基本的数字处理任务,德国手语的结构以特定的方式影响数字表征。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023阿帕,保留所有权利)
Discusses the processing of number parity in deaf participants. Number magnitude and number parity seem to be fundamental number representations. In this study we examine how parity and magnitude are represented in native signers. In signed face-to-face communication the addressee perceives a mirror image of what the sender produces. 20 prelingually deaf participants were tested. 19/1 were right/left dominant. Participants were instructed to decide whether a presented numeral was even or odd by pressing one of two response keys. One digit Arabic numerals were presented. Two experimental parts-counterbalanced across participants and preceded by 12 training trials-with different parity to response hand assignments were realized. The results indicate that both, magnitude representation (SNARC effect) and the semantic lexicon affect parity judgments of Arabic digits in deaf signers. We observed no language specific influence on number magnitude representation, since the orientation of the SNARC effect was identical to the hearing population. In sum, these findings suggest that even in an elementary number processing task, the structure of German Sign Language influences number representations in a specific way.(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)