Predicting walking and cycling behaviour change using an extended Theory of Planned Behaviour
Predicting walking and cycling behaviour change using an extended Theory of Planned Behaviour
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jth.2018.05.014
复制
发表时间：
2018-09-01
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Ogilvie, David
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bird, Emma L.;Panter, Jenna;Ogilvie, David
简介：行为变化的心理预测因子可能与参与行为的预测因子不同，并且关于心理结构与身体活动行为（如步行和骑自行车）变化之间的关联的证据有限。本研究的观察性队列数据研究是否扩展版本的计划行为理论（eTPB）预测的变化，步行和骑自行车的运输和娱乐使用人口为基础的样本的成年人从三个英国municipalities.Methods：我们使用的基线，1年和2年的后续数据从iConnect研究。来自eTPB的九个心理结构以及每周花费的时间（i）步行和（ii）骑自行车，每个（i）用于交通和（ii）用于娱乐，在所有时间点自我报告。多项逻辑回归被用来检查基线eTPB结构之间的关联和（一）增加和（二）减少在四个行为的结果，调整社会人口特征。结果：1796和1465参与者提供1年和2年的随访数据，分别。除主观规范外，所有eTPB结构均与四种结果中至少一种结果的变化相关，但在大量测试中，这些结果的显著相关性相对较少。在一般情况下，eTPB结构更经常与增加比减少花在步行和骑自行车的时间。结论：这是第一个已知的研究，研究心理预测的变化，步行和骑自行车的运输和娱乐使用扩展的TPB。未来的干预措施，以促进步行和骑自行车通过单独交付的方法可能会考虑促进积极的态度，感知行为控制，意图和习惯，这些行为的发展。
Introduction: The psychological predictors of behaviour change may differ from the predictors of engaging in behaviour, and there is limited evidence on the associations between psychological constructs and changes in physical activity behaviours such as walking and cycling. This study of observational cohort data examined whether an extended version of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (eTPB) predicted change in walking and cycling for transport and recreation using a population-based sample of adults from three UK municipalities.Methods: We used baseline, 1-year and 2-year follow-up data from the iConnect study. Nine psychological constructs from the eTPB as well as weekly time spent (i) walking and (ii) cycling, each (i) for transport and (ii) for recreation, were self-reported at all time points. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine associations between baseline eTPB constructs and (i) increases and (ii) decreases in the four behavioural outcomes, adjusted for socio-demographic characteristics.Results: 1796 and 1465 participants provided 1- and 2-year follow-up data, respectively. All eTPB constructs except subjective norms were associated with changes in at least one of the four outcomes, but these amounted to relatively few significant associations among the large number tested. In general, eTPB constructs were more often associated with increases than with decreases in time spent walking and cycling.Conclusions: This is one of the first known studies to examine psychological predictors of change in walking and cycling for transport and recreation using an extended TPB. Future interventions to promote walking and cycling through individually delivered approaches might consider fostering the development of positive attitudes, perceived behavioural control, intentions, and habits for these behaviours.