The Effect of Knowledge, Risk Perception, and Responsibility on Preventive Behavior of COVID-19

The Effect of Knowledge, Risk Perception, and Responsibility on Preventive Behavior of COVID-19
复制标题

知识、风险认知和责任对 COVID-19 预防行为的影响

DOI:
10.11447/jjra.sra-0376
复制
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
塩谷尚正
塩谷尚正
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
喜納彩;友利祐斗;Renzetti Andrea;福本晃造;安里英治;塩谷尚正

文献摘要

相似文献

本研究探讨了知识对传染病预防行为、风险认知和感染涟漪反应责任的影响。感染的涟漪反应意味着一个人感染了传染病,然后感染另一个人,结果是感染进一步蔓延,对社会产生各种影响。一个人对涟漪反应的责任预期越强烈,他就越有可能采取预防措施。同样地,知识量对预防行为有促进作用,而风险知觉的影响则较弱。基于上述预测,在COVID-19传播期间进行了一项基于网络的调查。从1238人获得的数据进行了分析,他们分为两个地区,根据紧急状态发布的时间。研究结果显示,无论在区域上,知识与责任感对预防行为的主效应皆为显著正向影响。此外,知识与责任感之间的交互作用显著,知识越低,责任感的作用越强。讨论了知识和责任感对传染病预防行为的重要性。
This study examined the effects of knowledge on infectious disease preventive behavior, risk perception, and responsibility for the ripple effects of infection. The ripple effect of infection implies that an individual is infected with an infectious disease and then infects another person, with the result that the infection spreads further, and various effects are exerted on society. The more strongly an individual has the expectation of responsibility for the ripple effect, the more likely the individual will take preventive action. Similarly, the amount of the knowledge has a promotive effect on preventive behavior, while risk perception is expected to have a weaker influence. Based on the above predictions, a web-based survey was conducted during the period of the spread of COVID-19. Data obtained from 1238 people were analyzed by classifying them into two regions according to the time when the state of emergency was issued. The results indicated the main effect of knowledge and sense of responsibility was significantly positive influence on preventive behavior regardless of the region. In addition, the interaction between knowledge and sense of responsibility was significant; the effect of sense of responsibility became stronger when knowledge was low. The importance of knowledge and sense of responsibility for infectious disease prevention behavior is discussed.