Reply to 'Drivers of the 2013/14 winter floods in the UK'
Reply to 'Drivers of the 2013/14 winter floods in the UK'
复制标题
DOI:
10.1038/nclimate2613
复制
发表时间:
2015-06
影响因子:
30.7
通讯作者:
C. Huntingford;T. Marsh;Adam A. Scaife;E. Kendon;J. Hannaford;A. Kay;M. Lockwood;C. Prudhomme;N. Reynard;S. Parry;J. Lowe;J. Screen;H. C. Ward;M. Roberts;P. Stott;V. Bell;Mark J. Bailey;A. Jenkins;T. Legg;F. Otto;N. Massey;N. Schaller;J. Slingo;M. Allen
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
C. Huntingford;T. Marsh;Adam A. Scaife;E. Kendon;J. Hannaford;A. Kay;M. Lockwood;C. Prudhomme;N. Reynard;S. Parry;J. Lowe;J. Screen;H. C. Ward;M. Roberts;P. Stott;V. Bell;Mark J. Bailey;A. Jenkins;T. Legg;F. Otto;N. Massey;N. Schaller;J. Slingo;M. Allen
Perspective1 on the potential factors in the UK floods of December, January and February 2013/14 (DJF1314) discusses potential links between remote drivers in the climate system, Atlantic atmospheric circulation and storminess and UK precipitation. Based on a correlational analysis, van Oldenborgh et al. 2 are critical of these links, arguing for instance that winter rainfall amounts for parts of the UK have only a correlation of 0.23 when compared with the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO). The disagreement is essentially one of spatial scale: their arguments are based on a particularly localized measure of rainfall for southern England, rather than the Atlantic atmospheric circulation or more UK-wide precipitation and river flows that we discussed.