Criminogenic Factors, Psychotic Symptoms, and Incident Arrests Among People With Serious Mental Illnesses Under Intensive Outpatient Treatment
Criminogenic Factors, Psychotic Symptoms, and Incident Arrests Among People With Serious Mental Illnesses Under Intensive Outpatient Treatment
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/lhb0000104
复制
发表时间：
2015-04-01
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Link, Bruce G.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Prins, Seth J.;Skeem, Jennifer L.;Link, Bruce G.
虽然研究有力地表明，一般或“犯罪成因”的因素预测累犯的各种措施，有争议的程度，这些因素，与未经治疗的症状，导致司法参与精神疾病的人。基于183名接受强化门诊治疗的人的样本，平均随访34.5个月，本研究测试了犯罪因素（即，一些“核心八项”的因子分析衍生代理; Andrews & Bonta，2010）和精神病性症状与逮捕独立相关。该研究还比较了这些领域的预测效用。在完全校正的模型中，反社会分量表和男性与逮捕率增加相关，而精神病和年龄与逮捕率降低相关。致犯罪因素和精神病性症状具有可比的预测效用。我们的结论是，犯罪因素，主要是逮捕历史和精神病症状预测逮捕率。这两套变量似乎有用的人与精神疾病谁不是目前的惩教监督逮捕的风险评估。
Although research robustly indicates that general or "criminogenic" factors predict various measures of recidivism, there is controversy about the extent to which these factors, versus untreated symptoms, lead to justice involvement for people with mental illnesses. Based on a sample of 183 people in intensive outpatient treatment followed for an average period of 34.5 months, the present study tested whether criminogenic factors (i.e., factor-analytically derived proxies of some of the "Central Eight"; Andrews & Bonta, 2010) and psychotic symptoms were independently associated with arrest. The study also compared the predictive utility of these domains. In the fully adjusted model, the antisocial subscale and male sex were associated with increased arrest rates, whereas psychosis and age were associated with decreased arrest rates. Criminogenic factors and psychotic symptoms had comparable predictive utility. We conclude that criminogenic factors-chiefly arrest history-and psychotic symptoms predict arrest rates. Both sets of variables appear useful for assessing risk of arrest among people with mental illnesses who are not under current correctional supervision.