Optimized testing strategy for the diagnosis of GAA-FGF14 ataxia/spinocerebellar ataxia 27B.

Optimized testing strategy for the diagnosis of GAA-FGF14 ataxia/spinocerebellar ataxia 27B.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1038/s41598-023-36654-8
复制
发表时间:
2023-06-15
期刊:
影响因子:
4.6
通讯作者:
--
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

FGF 14中显性遗传的GAA重复扩增是脊髓小脑性共济失调(GAA-FGF 14共济失调;脊髓小脑性共济失调27 B)的常见原因。迄今为止,FGF 14 GAA重复扩增的分子确认主要依赖于长读段测序,这是一种尚未在临床实验室中广泛使用的技术。我们开发并验证了一种使用长距离PCR、双向重复引物PCR和桑格测序检测FGF 14 GAA重复扩增的策略。我们在22名法裔加拿大患者的队列中将该策略与靶向纳米孔测序进行了比较,然后在53名患有未解决的共济失调的法国索引患者的队列中对其进行了验证。方法比较表明,与纳米孔测序相比,长距离PCR扩增产物的毛细管电泳显著低估了扩增大小(斜率,0.87 [95% CI,0.81至0.93];截距,14.58 [95% CI,-2.48至31.12])和凝胶电泳(斜率,0.84 [95% CI,0.78至0.97];截距,21.34 [95% CI,− 27.66至40.22])。后一种技术产生了类似的大小估计。用内部对照校准后,毛细管电泳和纳米孔测序之间的扩增大小估计值相似(斜率:0.98 [95%CI,0.92 - 1.04];截距:10.62 [95%CI,-7.49至27.71]),凝胶电泳(斜率:0.94 [95% CI,0.88至1.09];截距:18.81 [95% CI,-41.93至39.15])。使用该策略,所有22例法裔加拿大患者的诊断均得到准确证实。我们还确定了9名法国患者(9/53; 17%)及其2名亲属携带FGF 14(GAA)≥250扩增。这种新的策略可靠地检测和确定FGF 14 GAA扩增的大小,并且与长读序测序相比是有利的。
Dominantly inherited GAA repeat expansions in FGF14 are a common cause of spinocerebellar ataxia (GAA-FGF14 ataxia; spinocerebellar ataxia 27B). Molecular confirmation of FGF14 GAA repeat expansions has thus far mostly relied on long-read sequencing, a technology that is not yet widely available in clinical laboratories. We developed and validated a strategy to detect FGF14 GAA repeat expansions using long-range PCR, bidirectional repeat-primed PCRs, and Sanger sequencing. We compared this strategy to targeted nanopore sequencing in a cohort of 22 French Canadian patients and next validated it in a cohort of 53 French index patients with unsolved ataxia. Method comparison showed that capillary electrophoresis of long-range PCR amplification products significantly underestimated expansion sizes compared to nanopore sequencing (slope, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.81 to 0.93]; intercept, 14.58 [95% CI, − 2.48 to 31.12]) and gel electrophoresis (slope, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.97]; intercept, 21.34 [95% CI, − 27.66 to 40.22]). The latter techniques yielded similar size estimates. Following calibration with internal controls, expansion size estimates were similar between capillary electrophoresis and nanopore sequencing (slope: 0.98 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.04]; intercept: 10.62 [95% CI, − 7.49 to 27.71]), and gel electrophoresis (slope: 0.94 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.09]; intercept: 18.81 [95% CI, − 41.93 to 39.15]). Diagnosis was accurately confirmed for all 22 French Canadian patients using this strategy. We also identified 9 French patients (9/53; 17%) and 2 of their relatives who carried an FGF14 (GAA)≥250 expansion. This novel strategy reliably detected and sized FGF14 GAA expansions, and compared favorably to long-read sequencing.
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11253-1
发表时间: 2022-07-23
影响因子: 6
作者:
Bogdan, T.;Wirth, T.;Anheim, M.
通讯作者: Anheim, M.
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000004311
发表时间: 2017-09-05
期刊: NEUROLOGY
影响因子: 9.9
作者:
Giordano, Ilaria;Harmuth, Florian;Klockgether, Thomas
通讯作者: Klockgether, Thomas
DOI: 10.1007/s004390050552
发表时间: 1997-10-01
期刊: HUMAN GENETICS
影响因子: 5.3
作者:
Larsen, LA;Gronskov, K;Vuust, J
通讯作者: Vuust, J
DOI: 10.1136/mp.50.5.261
发表时间: 1997-10-01
期刊: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY-MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY
影响因子: --
作者:
Le, H;Fung, D;Trent, RJ
通讯作者: Trent, RJ
DOI: 10.1002/humu.23946
发表时间: 2019-11-25
期刊: HUMAN MUTATION
影响因子: 3.9
作者:
Ngo, Kathie J.;Rexach, Jessica E.;Fogel, Brent L.
通讯作者: Fogel, Brent L.