Knowing what to look for: comments on stuttering identification--standard definition and moment of stuttering.
Knowing what to look for: comments on stuttering identification--standard definition and moment of stuttering.
复制标题
知道要寻找什么：口吃识别评论——口吃的标准定义和时刻。
DOI：
10.1044/jshr.2404.622
复制
发表时间：
1981
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Wingate
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Wingate
我怀着极大的兴趣阅读了最近的一篇文章。59-63）马丁和哈罗德森。他们所处理的问题是一个重要的问题，他们的方法和报告的结果的某些方面值得评论。他们的方法有几个特点值得批评。一个主要的局限性，我认为vitiates大部分的分析，是作者使用了”标准定义”的文章（温盖特，1964年）的方式不是故意的，而且，已经释义了一个非常有限的部分，该出版物，以服务于他们的目的。”标准定义”条款的目的是（a）重新强调口吃意味着言语障碍，（B）指出这个术语指的是比”重复和犹豫"、”不流利”等更具体的东西。该条的实质内容并不打算作为最终的客观具体规定，这一立场清楚地反映在该条本身。引用该条最后一段：
I read with considerable interest a recent article~] SHR, Vol. 24, pp. 59-63) by Martin and Haroldson. The matter they address is an important one, and certain aspects of their method and reported results deserve comment. There are both positive and negative comments to be made; I will address the negative ones first.There are several features of their method which deserve criticism. A major limitation, which I believe vitiates much of the analysis presented, is that the authors have used the" standard definition" article (Wingate, 1964) in a manner not intended and, moreover, have paraphrased a very limited section of that publication to serve their purposes. The objectives of the" standard definition" article were (a) to reinstate the focus that stuttering means a speech disorder and (b) to point out that the term refers to something more specific than" repetitions and hesitations,"" disflueney," or the like. The substance of the article was not intended as the ultimate in objective specification, and this position is clearly reflected in the article itself. To quote the final paragraph of that article: