Lineup administrator influences on eyewitness identification and eyewitness confidence
Lineup administrator influences on eyewitness identification and eyewitness confidence
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.06.003
复制
发表时间：
2013-09-01
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
Moreland, Molly B.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Clark, Steven E.;Brower, Gwendolyn L.;Moreland, Molly B.
列队管理员接受了培训，以便以这样一种方式对证人作出反应，即将他们从不指认或阻挠指认的反应转向指认嫌疑人。与无影响控制条件相比，在影响条件下，有罪和无辜嫌疑人的嫌疑人识别率大幅增加。当嫌疑人有罪时，管理人员会更具体地引导证人接近嫌疑人，而不是当嫌疑人无罪时。正确识别犯罪嫌疑人的识别后的信心没有显着差异的影响和无影响组。然而，鉴定后的无辜嫌疑人的虚假身份的信心显着低于影响力组比无影响力组，因为证人谁是影响，使虚假身份往往是那些谁是不太有信心之前的阵容，也因为这些证人变得不太有信心，从前到后的身份。(C)2013年由Elsevier Inc.出版记忆与认知应用研究协会的代表
Lineup administrators were trained to respond to witnesses in such a way as to redirect them from making non-identifications or foil identification responses toward making identifications of the suspect. Compared to a no-influence control condition, suspect identification rates in the influence condition increased substantially and proportionally for guilty and innocent suspects. Administrators steered witnesses more specifically toward the suspect when the suspect was guilty than when the suspect was innocent. Post-identification confidence for correct identifications of the guilty suspect did not differ significantly across the influence and no-influence groups. However, post-identification confidence for false identifications of the innocent suspect was significantly lower for the influence group than for the no-influence group because witnesses who were influenced to make false identifications tended to be those who were less confident prior to the lineup, and also because those witnesses became less confident from pre- to post-identification. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition.