When false memories do not occur:: Not thinking of the lure or remembering that it was not heard?
When false memories do not occur:: Not thinking of the lure or remembering that it was not heard?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/096582100387669
复制
发表时间：
2000-03-01
期刊：
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Brédart, S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Brédart, S
本研究的目的是评估在Deese-Roediger-McDermott （DRM）范式中对不发生错误记忆的两种解释。一种解释是，一个关键的诱惑没有被回忆起来，因为这个列表没有在参与者的脑海中唤起它。另一种可能的解释是，参与者会识别出关键的诱饵，并在回忆时记住诱饵不是由外部来源产生的。为了探究不出现错误记忆的这两种可能的解释，在通常的DRM范式中增加了一个实验阶段：参与者被要求回忆他们想到但没有回忆起来的项目，因为这些项目不在实验者提供的列表中。在标准回忆任务中没有回忆起关键诱饵的参与者中，在附加阶段回忆起关键诱饵的人数超过了没有回忆起它的人数。这个结果比第一种解释更符合第二种解释。
The aim of the present study was to evaluate two explanations for the non-occurrence of false memories in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm. One explanation was that a critical lure is not recalled because the list failed to evoke it in the participant's mind. Another possible explanation was that the participant would identify the critical lure and would remember, at the time of recall, that the lure was not produced by an external source. In order to explore these two possible explanations for the non-occurrence of false memories, an experimental phase was added to the usual DRM paradigm: participants were asked to recall items they thought of but did not recall because these items were not members of the list presented by the experimenter. Among participants who did not recall the critical lure during the standard recall task, those who recalled the critical lure during the additional phase outnumbered those who did not recall it. This result is more consistent with the second explanation than with the first one.