Time to Abandon the Notion of Personal Choice in Dietary Counseling for Obesity?
Time to Abandon the Notion of Personal Choice in Dietary Counseling for Obesity?
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.jada.2011.05.014
复制
发表时间:
2011-08-01
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Pagoto, Sherry L.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Appelhans, Bradley M.;Whited, Matthew C.;Pagoto, Sherry L.
Current approaches to dietary counseling for obesity are heavily rooted in the notion of “personal choice” Typically, patients receive education about dietary contributions to energy balance and are then encouraged to make dietary choices (eg, food selections, portion sizes) consistent with weight loss. Yet even highly motivated and nutritionally-informed patients often struggle to refrain from highly palatable, energy-dense foods available in the modern environment, and ultimately, only a small percentage of individuals achieve sustained weight loss through dietary modification (1–4). Failed attempts at weight control are frustrating to patients and providers alike. Studies show that both parties frequently attribute obesity to poor “personal choices” or insufficient “willpower” on the part of the patient (5, 6). For example, a sample of British dietitians ranked “lack of willpower” as more important to the development of obesity than genetic factors (7), even though adult body mass is 55–75% heritable (8, 9). The suggestion that individuals become or remain obese due to their unhealthy personal choices, or a lack of willpower to make healthy choices, is stigmatizing to patients and unlikely to motivate patients to lose weight (10). Deemphasizing the role of personal choice in dietary counseling for obesity would reduce stigma, but doing so carries the risk of undermining patients’ perceived control over their