A review of 50 years of research on naturally occurring family routines and rituals: cause for celebration?

A review of 50 years of research on naturally occurring family routines and rituals: cause for celebration?
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/0893-3200.16.4.381
复制
发表时间:
2002-12
期刊:
Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
B. Fiese;Thomas J. Tomcho;Michael A. Douglas;Kimberly Josephs;Scott Poltrock;T. Baker
B. Fiese;Thomas J. Tomcho;Michael A. Douglas;Kimberly Josephs;Scott Poltrock;T. Baker
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
B. Fiese;Thomas J. Tomcho;Michael A. Douglas;Kimberly Josephs;Scott Poltrock;T. Baker

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文对自J. Bossard和E.波尔(1950)关于家庭仪式的开创性工作进行。提供了定义,据此区分了作为可观察到的做法的家庭惯例和作为集体事件的象征性表现的家庭仪式。如文献所述,家庭惯例的相对发生似乎遵循一个发展过程,并受到文化环境的影响。家庭惯例和仪式被发现与养育能力,儿童的调整,和婚姻满意度。这些研究受到评估家庭惯例的方法不一致、依赖方便的样本以及未能区分直接和间接影响的限制。建议更好地结合理论与实证的努力,以证明家庭惯例和仪式在当代生活中的重要性。
This article is a qualitative review of 32 publications appearing since J. Bossard and E. Boll's (1950) seminal work on family rituals was conducted. Definitions are offered whereby a distinction is made between family routines as observable practices and family rituals as symbolic representations of collective events. The relative occurrence of family routines, as described in the literature, appears to follow a developmental course and is affected by the cultural environment. Family routines and rituals were found to be related to parenting competence, child adjustment, and marital satisfaction. The studies were limited by inconsistent methods of assessing family routines, reliance on samples of convenience, and a failure to distinguish between direct and indirect effects. Recommendations are made to better integrate theory with empirical efforts to demonstrate the importance of family routines and rituals in contemporary life.