The Carceral Archive: Documentary Records, Narrative Construction, and Predictive Risk Assessment
The Carceral Archive: Documentary Records, Narrative Construction, and Predictive Risk Assessment
复制标题
监狱档案：文献记录、叙事结构和预测风险评估
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Tonia Sutherland
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Tonia Sutherland
在过去的三十年里，社会学、犯罪学、法学、公共政策、历史、科学和技术研究(STS)以及其他相关领域的学术研究解决了美国种族和惩教监督交叉路口的各种关切领域。一些学者认为，现代监狱工业综合体是动产奴隶制的明显延伸，而另一些学者则断言，监狱意识形态的无处不在导致了更广泛的社会不平等--这种不平等的影响以至于阻止来自受压迫和边缘化社区的人充分参与美国生活。这一奖学金明确证明了根据种族和民族指数计算的监禁率持续存在的差距；随着数据文化的扩张--大数据、数据科学和数据分析等部门的增长--在美国的社会文化景观和社会技术环境中，最近的学术关注的焦点是技术也有助于--而且往往加剧--这些差距的方式。
Over the past three decades, scholarship in sociology, criminology, law, public policy, history, science and technology studies (STS), and other allied fields has addressed various areas of concern at the intersections of race and correctional supervision in the United States. Some scholars have argued that the modern day prison industrial complex is a transparent extension of chattel slavery, while others have asserted that a ubiquity of carceral ideologies has contributed to a broader social inequality—one so affecting as to prevent people from oppressed and marginalized communities from full participation in American life. This scholarship unambiguously attests to ongoing disparities in rates of incarceration calculated along the indices of race and ethnicity; with data cultures expanding—evidenced by growth in sectors such as big data, data science, and data analytics—in the sociocultural landscapes and sociotechnical environments of the United States, more recent scholarship has focused on the ways that technology also contributes to—and often exacerbates—these disparities.