Locating and appraising systematic reviews
Locating and appraising systematic reviews
复制标题
DOI：
10.7326/0003-4819-126-7-199704010-00006
复制
发表时间：
1997-04-01
影响因子：
39.2
通讯作者：
McKibbon, KA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hunt, DL;McKibbon, KA
在这篇文章中，我们描述了几种定位系统综述方法的优缺点，包括MEDLINE、Best Evidence（ACP Journal Club和Evidence-Based Medicine的电子版）和科克伦图书馆（由科克伦协作组织定期更新的综述和对照试验来源）等电子数据库。我们还介绍了可用于批判性评价综述文章的步骤;例如，我们使用了一项系统性综述，在临床场景中评价各种非甾体抗炎药的胃肠道毒性。
In this article, we describe the strengths and weaknesses of several methods of locating systematic reviews, including electronic databases such as MEDLINE, Best Evidence (the electronic version of ACP Journal Club and Evidence-Based Medicine), and the Cochrane Library (a regularly updated source of reviews and controlled trials produced by the Cochrane Collaboration). We also present steps that can be used to critically appraise review articles; as an example, we use a systematic review that evaluates the gastrointestinal toxicity of various nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the context of a clinical scenario.