Time Course Analysis of the Effects of Distractor Frequency and Categorical Relatedness in Picture Naming : An Evaluation of the Response Exclusion Account

Time Course Analysis of the Effects of Distractor Frequency and Categorical Relatedness in Picture Naming : An Evaluation of the Response Exclusion Account
复制标题

图片命名中干扰频率和类别相关性影响的时间进程分析:响应排除帐户的评估

DOI:
10.1080/01690965.2011.608026
复制
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
Language and Cognitive Processes
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
L.
L.
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kajihara;T.;Verdonschot;R. G;Sparks;J.;& Stewart;L.

文献摘要

相似文献

Mahon 及其同事提出的响应排除帐户 (REA) 将干扰项频率效应和图片命名中的语义干扰效应定位在响应输出缓冲区的级别。我们从 REA 中得出四个预测:(1)干扰词频率效应的大小应与大声朗读干扰词时获得的频率效应相同,(2)当刺激开始异步(SOA)被操纵时,干扰词频率效应的大小不应改变,(3)干扰词引起的干扰效应(从非词控制干扰词测量)应随着 SOA 的增加而增加,(4)词频效应和语义干扰效应应为添加剂。实验 1 中的图片命名任务和实验 2 中的单词阅读任务的结果反驳了所有四个预测。我们讨论了对传统竞争选择模型中获得的研究结果的初步解释,其中上下文效应都集中在词汇选择的层面上。
The response exclusion account (REA), advanced by Mahon and colleagues, localises the distractor frequency effect and the semantic interference effect in picture naming at the level of the response output buffer. We derive four predictions from the REA: (1) the size of the distractor frequency effect should be identical to the frequency effect obtained when distractor words are read aloud, (2) the distractor frequency effect should not change in size when stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA) is manipulated, (3) the interference effect induced by a distractor word (as measured from a nonword control distractor) should increase in size with increasing SOA, and (4) the word frequency effect and the semantic interference effect should be additive. The results of the picture-naming task in Experiment 1 and the word-reading task in Experiment 2 refute all four predictions. We discuss a tentative account of the findings obtained within a traditional selection-by-competition model in which both context effects are localised at the level of lexical selection.