Seeing double: a comparison of microstructure, biomechanical function, and adjacent disc health between double- and single-layer vertebral endplates.
Seeing double: a comparison of microstructure, biomechanical function, and adjacent disc health between double- and single-layer vertebral endplates.
复制标题
查看双重:比较双层和单层椎骨终结之间的微观结构,生物力学功能和相邻的椎间盘健康。
DOI:
10.1097/brs.0b013e318267bcfc
复制
发表时间:
2012-10-01
期刊:
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
Lotz JC
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fields AJ;Sahli F;Rodriguez AG;Lotz JC
Experimental and computational assessment of thickness, porosity, biomechanical behavior, and adjacent disc glycosaminoclycan (GAG) content in double-layer and single-layer bony endplate samples harvested from human cadaver spines. Determine if the second layer of bone in double-layer vertebral endplates allows the superficial layer to achieve a more optimal balance between its biomechanical and nutritional functions. Proper disc health requires the endplate to balance opposing biomechanical and nutritional functions. Previous studies investigating endplate function report the occurrence of double-layer endplates, but it remains unclear whether the second layer of bone has any functional advantage. Such information could shed light on the factors that protect against disc degeneration. Six lumbar spines were obtained from human cadavers (32–84 years) and scanned with magnetic resonance imaging. Cylindrical cores that included the endplate and underlying trabecular bone were harvested from the center of the superior vertebral endplates (six double-layer endplates and twelve single-layer endplates) and imaged using micro-CT. The thickness and porosity of the bony endplate layers was measured for each core. High-resolution finite element analysis was performed to assess biomechanical behavior. GAG content within the adjacent nucleus tissue was quantified using the dimethylmethylene blue technique. The superficial layer of the double-layer endplates was 50% thinner (p = 0.009) and tended also to be more porous than single-layer endplates. Strains were higher in thinner endplates; however, the second layer of bone in the double-layer endplates had a stiffening effect so that despite being thinner than single-layer endplates, the superficial layer of the double-layer endplates had a similar risk of damage. After adjusting for age, GAG content was significantly higher in the nucleus tissue adjacent to the double-layer endplates (p = 0.01). Compared to single-layer endplates, double-layer endplates appear to permit a more optimal balance between endplate biomechanical and nutritional function and may therefore offer a significant protective factor against disc degeneration.