Work site health promotion research: To what extent can we generalize the results and what is needed to translate research to practice?
Work site health promotion research: To what extent can we generalize the results and what is needed to translate research to practice?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1090198103254340
复制
发表时间：
2003-10-01
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
Estabrooks, P
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bull, SS;Gillette, C;Estabrooks, P
工作场所健康促进研究的外部效度信息是将研究成果转化为实践所必需的。作者提供了工作场所健康行为干预的文献综述。使用RE-AIM框架，他们总结了这些研究的特征和结果，以记录干预范围、采用、实施和维护的报告。作者回顾了来自11个主要健康行为期刊的24篇出版物。他们发现，87.5%的研究报告了合格员工的参与率；只有25%的研究报告了干预措施的采用。不到10%的研究报告了参与者与非参与者的特征数据。12.5%的研究报告了实施数据。只有8%的研究报告了任何类型的维护数据。需要更加强调员工的代表性、所研究的工作场所设置和长期结果。提供了如何做到这一点的示例。
Information on external validity of work site health promotion research is essential to translate research findings to practice. The authors provide a literature review of work site health behavior interventions. Using the RE-AIM framework, they summarize characteristics and results of these studies to document reporting of intervention reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. The authors reviewed a total of 24 publications from 11 leading health behavior journals. They found that participation rates among eligible employees were reported in 87.5% of studies; only 25% of studies reported on intervention adoption. Data on characteristics of participants versus nonparticipants were reported in fewer than 10% of studies. Implementation data were reported in 12.5% of the studies. Only 8% of studies reported any type of maintenance data. Stronger emphasis is needed on representativeness of employees, work site settings studied, and longer term results. Examples of how this can be done are provided.