Comparison of droplet digital PCR and quantitative real-time PCR for examining population dynamics of bacteria in soil

Comparison of droplet digital PCR and quantitative real-time PCR for examining population dynamics of bacteria in soil
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s00253-014-5794-4
复制
发表时间:
2014-07-01
影响因子:
5
通讯作者:
Cho, Kyung-Suk
Cho, Kyung-Suk
中科院分区:
工程技术2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kim, Tae Gwan;Jeong, So-Yeon;Cho, Kyung-Suk

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

微滴数字PCR(DD-PCR)技术作为一种DNA定量技术在医学诊断领域有着广阔的应用前景。本研究以实时荧光定量PCR(qRT-PCR)为参考技术,评价了DD-PCR作为土壤DNA定量工具的适用性。使用贪铜菌属MBT 14和鞘氨醇菌属MD 2,并为每种设计引物/TaqMan探针组(分别为CupMBT和SphMD 2)。对10倍稀释系列的标准曲线分析表明,qRT-PCR和DD-PCR在其检测范围内均表现出良好的线性(R(2)= 1.00)和PCR效率(千分之92%)。然而,DD-PCR显示出比qRT-PCR高10倍的灵敏度。将MBT 14和MD 2分别以每克土壤约5 × 10(8)和约5 × 10(7)个细胞的浓度添加到非无菌土壤中(n = 5)。该细菌负荷试验表明,DD-PCR比qRT-PCR更敏感和更具区分性。例如,DD-PCR显示随着细菌负荷的增加,DNA从14逐渐增加到141,160 MBT 14 rDNA拷贝μ L DNA提取物(-1),而qRT-PCR可以定量DNA(6,432拷贝μ L DNA(-1)),单位为每千日元5 × 10(5)MBT 14/克土壤。当在改良土壤中监测3周的时间DNA变化时,两种技术随着时间的推移表现出几乎相同的变化。线性测试(y =中心点x)显示两种技术之间具有极好的定量一致性(CupMBT组中a = 0.98,R(2)= 0.97,SphMD 2组中a = 0.90,R(2)= 0.94)。这些结果表明,DD-PCR是一种很有前途的工具,可以检测复杂环境中微生物的时间动态。
The newly developed droplet digital PCR (DD-PCR) has shown promise as a DNA quantification technology in medical diagnostic fields. This study evaluated the applicability of DD-PCR as a quantitative tool for soil DNA using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) as a reference technology. Cupriavidus sp. MBT14 and Sphingopyxis sp. MD2 were used, and a primer/TaqMan probe set was designed for each (CupMBT and SphMD2, respectively). Standard curve analyses on tenfold dilution series showed that both qRT-PCR and DD-PCR exhibited excellent linearity (R (2) = 1.00) and PCR efficiency (a parts per thousand yen92 %) across their detectable ranges. However, DD-PCR showed a tenfold greater sensitivity than qRT-PCR. MBT14 and MD2 were added to non-sterile soil at 0 similar to 5 x 10(8) and 0 similar to 5 x 10(7) cells per gram of soil, respectively (n = 5). This bacterial load test indicated that DD-PCR was more sensitive and discriminating than qRT-PCR. For instance, DD-PCR showed a gradual DNA increase from 14 to 141,160 MBT14 rDNA copies mu L DNA extract(-1) as the bacterial load increased, while qRT-PCR could quantify the DNA (6,432 copies mu L DNA(-1)) at a parts per thousand yen5 x 10(5) MBT14 per gram of soil. When temporal DNA changes were monitored for 3 weeks in the amended soils, the two technologies exhibited nearly identical changes over time. Linearity tests (y = a center dot x) revealed excellent quantitative agreement between the two technologies (a = 0.98, R (2) = 0.97 in the CupMBT set and a = 0.90, R (2) = 0.94 in the SphMD2 set). These results suggest that DD-PCR is a promising tool to examine temporal dynamics of microorganisms in complex environments.