Cultural Diversity and Methodology in Feminist Psychology: Critique, Proposal, Empirical Example
Cultural Diversity and Methodology in Feminist Psychology: Critique, Proposal, Empirical Example
复制标题
女性主义心理学中的文化多样性和方法论：批评、建议、实证
DOI：
10.1111/j.1471-6402.1992.tb00246.x
复制
发表时间：
1992
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
Alice Brown
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
H. Landrine;E. Klonoff;Alice Brown
本文呼吁对女性主义心理学研究的方法进行修订，因为如果不改变方法论，文化差异就无法被调查或整合。实证研究证明了一种结合了 etic（客观、行为）和 emic（主观、现象学）方法的方法。白人女性在一些性别角色刻板印象的自我评价方面与有色人种女性没有差异（etic数据）。然而，两组在自我评级时定义和解释这些术语的方式存在显着差异（主位数据），而这些主观的、文化构成的解释预测了自我评级。
This article calls for a revision in the methodology of feminist psychological research because cultural differences can neither be investigated nor integrated without methodological change. A methodology that combines etic (objective, behavioral) and emic (subjective, phenomenological) approaches was demonstrated in an empirical investigation. White women did not differ from women of color in self-ratings on several gender-role stereotypic terms (etic data). However, the two groups differed significantly in how they had defined and interpreted those terms while rating themselves (emic data), and these subjective, culturally constituted interpretations predicted the self-ratings.