Interdisciplinarity at the Journal and Specialty Level: The Changing Knowledge Bases of the Journal Cognitive Science

Interdisciplinarity at the Journal and Specialty Level: The Changing Knowledge Bases of the Journal Cognitive Science
复制标题

DOI:
10.1002/asi.22953
复制
发表时间:
2014-01-01
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
Goldstone, Robert L.
Goldstone, Robert L.
中科院分区:
管理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Leydesdorff, Loet;Goldstone, Robert L.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

利用三十年来认知科学文章中的引用模式,我们根据不断变化的学科构成分析了该文献的知识库。分为三个时期:(A)20世纪80年代跨学科空间的构建,(B)1990年代跨学科方向的发展,以及(C)2000年代重新融入“认知心理学”。使用因子分析可以减少和澄清不同可视化中跨学科划分的流动性和模糊性。我们还探索了新可用的例程(“CorText”),以使用冲积图从“管”的角度分析这一发展,并将结果与​​动画进行比较(使用“Visone”)。这一发展的历史特殊性可以与同一时期“人工智能”发展为综合专业相比较。跨学科性应该在期刊和专业层面上有不同的定义。
Using the referencing patterns in articles in Cognitive Science over three decades, we analyze the knowledge base of this literature in terms of its changing disciplinary composition. Three periods are distinguished: (A) construction of the interdisciplinary space in the 1980s, (B) development of an interdisciplinary orientation in the 1990s, and (C) reintegration into "cognitive psychology" in the 2000s. The fluidity and fuzziness of the interdisciplinary delineations in the different visualizations can be reduced and clarified using factor analysis. We also explore newly available routines ("CorText") to analyze this development in terms of "tubes" using an alluvial map and compare the results with an animation (using "Visone"). The historical specificity of this development can be compared with the development of "artificial intelligence" into an integrated specialty during this same period. Interdisciplinarity should be defined differently at the level of journals and of specialties.