STROOP PROCESS DISSOCIATIONS - THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FACILITATION AND INTERFERENCE
STROOP PROCESS DISSOCIATIONS - THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FACILITATION AND INTERFERENCE
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0096-1523.20.2.219
复制
发表时间：
1994-04-01
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
JACOBY, LL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
LINDSAY, DS;JACOBY, LL
本研究采用L·L·Jacoby(1991)的“加工分离程序”对Stroop任务中颜色命名和单词阅读对反应的贡献进行了定量研究。结果表明，颜色命名和单词阅读可以独立地决定反应。正如方程(实验1和实验2)所预测的那样，降低刺激颜色消除了Stroop易化和干扰之间的典型不对称。退化的刺激颜色降低了颜色命名对反应的估计贡献，但对单词阅读的估计贡献没有影响(实验2)。相反，增加不一致项目的比例减少了单词阅读的估计贡献，但对颜色命名的估计贡献没有影响(实验3和实验4)。结果表明，自动化过程的促进和干扰效应不能用与基线的差异来准确衡量。
L. L. Jacoby's (1991) ''process dissociation procedure'' was used to quantitatively estimate the contributions of color-naming and word-reading processes to responding on the Stroop task. The results show that color naming and word reading can operate independently to determine responses. Degrading stimulus colors eliminated the typical asymmetry between Stroop facilitation and interference, as predicted by the equations (Experiments 1 and 2). Degrading stimulus colors reduced the estimated contribution of color naming to responding but had no effect on the estimated contribution of word reading (Experiment 2). In contrast, increasing the proportion of incongruent items reduced the estimated contribution of word reading but had no effect on the estimated contribution of color naming (Experiments 3 and 4). The results indicate that the facilitating and interfering effects of automatic processes cannot be accurately measured in terms of differences from baseline.