Solution structure and small angle scattering analysis of TraI (381-569).

Solution structure and small angle scattering analysis of TraI (381-569).
复制标题

DOI:
10.1002/prot.24114
复制
发表时间:
2012-08
期刊:
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Schildbach JF
Schildbach JF
中科院分区:
生物学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wright NT;Raththagala M;Hemmis CW;Edwards S;Curtis JE;Krueger S;Schildbach JF

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

TraI是F质粒编码的切口酶,是质粒DNA从一种细菌接合转移到另一种细菌所必需的1756个氨基酸的蛋白质。虽然F TraI的N-和C-末端结构域的晶体结构已经确定,但蛋白质的中心结构域在结构上尚未探索。已知中心区域(在残基306和1520之间)通过高度进行性解旋酶活性结合单链DNA(ssDNA)和解旋DNA。在这里,我们表明,ssDNA结合位点位于残基381和858之间,我们还提出了该区域的N-末端(残基381至569)的高分辨率溶液结构。该片段折叠成被α螺旋包围的四链平行β折叠,并且类似于解旋酶如RecD和RecQ的N-末端的结构,尽管序列相似性很小。该结构支持的模型,F TraI导致从复制的RecD样结构域和随后的专业化的结构域到更多的N-末端ssDNA结合结构域和更多的C-末端结构域包含解旋酶基序。此外,我们提供的证据表明,切口酶和单链DNA结合域的TraI举行紧密的80个残基的接头序列,连接这两个域。这些结果为切口酶和ssDNA结合域之间的负协同效应提供了一个可能的物理解释。
TraI, the F plasmid-encoded nickase, is a 1756 amino acid protein essential for conjugative transfer of plasmid DNA from one bacterium to another. While crystal structures of N- and C-terminal domains of F TraI have been determined, central domains of the protein are structurally unexplored. The central region (between residues 306 and 1520) is known to both bind single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and unwind DNA through a highly processive helicase activity. Here, we show that the ssDNA binding site is located between residues 381 and 858, and we also present the high-resolution solution structure of the N-terminus of this region (residues 381 to 569). This fragment folds into a four-strand parallel β sheet surrounded by α helices, and resembles the structure of the N-terminus of helicases such as RecD and RecQ despite little sequence similarity. The structure supports the model that F TraI resulted from duplication of a RecD-like domain and subsequent specialization of domains into the more N-terminal ssDNA binding domain and the more C-terminal domain containing helicase motifs. In addition, we provide evidence that the nickase and ssDNA binding domains of TraI are held close together by an 80-residue linker sequence that connects the two domains. These results suggest a possible physical explanation for the apparent negative cooperativity between the nickase and ssDNA binding domain.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.12.057
发表时间: 2009-02-20
影响因子: 5.6
作者:
Guogas, Laura M.;Kennedy, Sarah A.;Lee, Jin-Hyup;Redinbo, Matthew R.
通讯作者: Redinbo, Matthew R.
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.273.32.20001
发表时间: 1998-08-07
影响因子: 4.8
作者:
Krueger, S;Gorshkova, I;Schwarz, FP
通讯作者: Schwarz, FP
DOI: 10.1128/jb.00154-10
发表时间: 2010-07-01
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
Dostal, Lubomir;Schildbach, Joel F.
通讯作者: Schildbach, Joel F.
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2009.2
发表时间: 2009-01-01
期刊: NATURE PROTOCOLS
影响因子: 14.8
作者:
Kelley, Lawrence A.;Sternberg, Michael J. E.
通讯作者: Sternberg, Michael J. E.
DOI: 10.1038/nature08588
发表时间: 2009-12-24
期刊: Nature
影响因子: 64.8
作者:
通讯作者: --