The limits of neo-liberalism. Authority, sovereignty and the logic of competition
The limits of neo-liberalism. Authority, sovereignty and the logic of competition
复制标题
新自由主义的局限性。
DOI：
10.1057/ap.2015.14
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
1.2
通讯作者：
H. Overbeek
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
H. Overbeek
许多人都注意到了 2008 年之后新自由主义的生存之谜（例如，Crouch，2011；Overbeek 和 van Apeldoorn，2012；Peck，2013）。毕竟，“市场”完全没能稳定全球金融体系，政府接管了这项任务，使用的工具违反了新自由主义书中的每一条规则，这在 2008 年秋天之前是不可想象的。戴维斯在《新自由主义的局限性》一书中追溯了新自由主义思想的发展，从其早期起源到其濒临消亡以及在全球金融危机中奇迹般的生存。戴维斯认为，所有新自由主义批评的核心特征是对政治话语模糊性的敌视，以及对以市场价格体系为模型的定量经济指标的明确性和透明度的承诺。新自由主义是追求通过经济学对政治的祛魅。（第4页，原文强调）
Many have noted the enigma of neo-liberalism’s survival after 2008 (for example, Crouch, 2011; Overbeek and van Apeldoorn, 2012; Peck, 2013). After all,‘the market’utterly failed to stabilise the global financial system, and governments took over this task applying instruments that violated every rule in the neoliberal book and that would have been unthinkable before the fall of 2008. In The Limits of Neoliberalism Davies traces the development of neo-liberal thinking from its early origins to its near demise and miraculous survival in the global financial crisis. Davies considers the central defining characteristic of all neoliberal critique [to be] its hostility to the ambiguity of political discourse, and a commitment to the explicitness and transparency of quantitative, economic indicators, of which the market price system is the model. Neoliberalism is the pursuit of the disenchantment of politics by economics.(p. 4, emphasis in original)