Risk Apportionment Via Bivariate Stochastic Dominance

Risk Apportionment Via Bivariate Stochastic Dominance
复制标题

DOI:
10.2139/ssrn.1550225
复制
发表时间:
2009-11
期刊:
ERN: Econometric Modeling in Microeconomics (Topic)
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Octave Jokung
Octave Jokung
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Octave Jokung

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文扩展到二元效用函数,Eeckhoudt等人(2009)对“坏”和“好”组合的结果。决策者更倾向于获得一些“好”和一些“坏”,而不是冒险获得所有“好”或所有“坏”,其中“坏”是通过(N,M)递增的凹顺序定义的。我们将Richard(1975)引入的二元风险规避概念推广到更高阶。重要的是,在二元框架中,对彩票的偏好[(X,T);(Y,Z)]到彩票[(X,Z);(Y,T)]当(X,Z)通过(N,M)增加凹阶支配(Y,T)时,我们可以断言(N,M)阶的二元风险分配,并扩展Eeckhoudt和Schlesinger(2006)定义的风险分配概念。
This paper extends to bivariate utility functions, Eeckhoudt et al.’s (2009) result for the combination of ‘bad’ and ‘good’. The decision-maker prefers to get some of the ‘good’ and some of the ‘bad’ to taking a chance on all the ‘good’ or all the ‘bad’ where ‘bad’ is defined via (N,M)-increasing concave order. We generalize the concept of bivariate risk aversion introduced by Richard (1975) to higher orders. Importantly, in the bivariate framework, preference for the lottery [(X,T);(Y,Z)] to the lottery [(X,Z);(Y,T)] when (X,Z) dominates (Y,T) via (N,M)-increasing concave order allows us to assert bivariate risk apportionment of order (N,M) and to extend the concept of risk apportionment defined by Eeckhoudt and Schlesinger (2006).