Factors affecting consumers' evaluation of food derived from animals fed insect meal: A systematic review

Factors affecting consumers' evaluation of food derived from animals fed insect meal: A systematic review
复制标题

影响消费者对昆虫粉动物食品评价的因素:系统评价

DOI:
10.1016/j.tifs.2023.05.018
复制
发表时间:
2023
影响因子:
15.3
通讯作者:
Pakseresht A
Pakseresht A
中科院分区:
农林科学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Pakseresht A

文献摘要

相似文献

背景近年来的研究表明,各种昆虫都有很大的潜力将有机基质转化为高品质的饲料。由于其高蛋白质和必需氨基酸含量,昆虫衍生的粉越来越多地被用于替代动物饲料中的常规饲料,如大豆和鱼粉。然而,消费者接受的食品来自动物生产的使用昆虫为基础的膳食是fragmented.Scope和approachA系统的文献综述进行了Scopus,Web of Science,AgEcon和谷歌学术,共有28篇文章符合选择标准。论文进行了审查,以确定影响消费者接受的昆虫为基础的feed.Key调查结果和结论:总体而言,审查表明,昆虫更容易接受消费者作为动物饲料比人类食品。影响消费者对昆虫基饲料评价的最重要因素包括风险认知、知识和启发性提示。伦理和环境问题也在决策过程中发挥了作用,但它们对消费者接受在动物饲料中使用昆虫的影响不太重要。食品新恐惧症,厌恶和对安全和健康的不确定性,主要来自消费者缺乏知识,成为接受动物饲料中昆虫的关键障碍。更熟悉用于生产昆虫餐的技术可以减轻厌恶感,甚至减轻新恐惧症的影响,尽管情感情绪反应不太可能仅仅通过意识和提供信息来改变。技术问题(包括基质和昆虫物种)以及由此产生的动物性食品的价格变化是相关因素,需要进一步研究消费者的接受程度。
BackgroundResearch in recent years has shown there is high potential for various insect species to converting organic substrates into high-quality feedstuffs. Insect-derived meal is increasingly being used to replace conventional feedstuffs such as soybean and fishmeal in animal diets, due to its high protein and essential amino acid content. However, research on consumer acceptance of foods derived from animals produced using insect-based meal is fragmented.Scope and approachA systematic literature review was carried out in Scopus, Web of Science, AgEcon, and Google Scholar, with a total of 28 articles meeting the selection criteria. Papers were reviewed to identify factors affecting consumer acceptance of insect-based feed.Key Findings and Conclusions: Overall, the review indicated that insects are more acceptable to consumers as an animal feedstuff than as human food. The most important factors influencing consumer evaluation of insect-based feed included risk perceptions, knowledge and heuristic cues. Ethical and environmental concerns also played a role in the decision-making process, but their effect on consumer acceptance of using insects in animal feed was less important. Food neophobia, disgust and uncertainties about safety and health, mainly deriving from lack of knowledge on the part of consumers, emerged as critical barriers to acceptance of insects in animal feed. Greater familiarity with the technology used for the production of insect meals could alleviate disgust and even lessen the impact of neophobia, although affective emotional reactions are unlikely to be changed by awareness and provision of information alone. Technological issues (including substrates and insect species) as well as price changes in the resulting animal-based foods are relevant factors that warrant further research in relation to consumer acceptance.