ARISTOTLE, ATHENAION POLITEIA 57.4: TRIAL OF ANIMALS AND INANIMATE OBJECTS FOR HOMICIDE
ARISTOTLE, ATHENAION POLITEIA 57.4: TRIAL OF ANIMALS AND INANIMATE OBJECTS FOR HOMICIDE
复制标题
亚里士多德,《雅典娜政治》 57.4:动物和无生命物体杀人审判
作者:
R. Sealey
The author of the Athenaion Politeia, here to be called Aristotle without prejudice to the question of his true identity, provides a section on the basileus. The latter’s tasks include conduct of trials for homicide (phonos) and wounding (trauma). The types of cases are outlined, and information is given about the composition and meeting-places of the courts. The section on the basileus ends with the sentence (57.4): ‘The basileus and the phylobasileis try also cases of homicide by inanimate objects and by animals.’ . In describing conditions current in his own time Aristotle probably drew on the code of laws which had been drawn up in 403–399 B.C. So his evidence is good. To the modern mind a practice of trying animals and inanimate objects on charges of homicide and perhaps wounding is strange. Explanation is required. The first purpose of this study is to attempt an explanation of the practice. But there is also a second purpose, namely to illustrate method. Here caution is needed. If a historian devotes a writing wholly to considering method, he may descend into fruitless and undignified charges against his predecessors without advancing the understanding of history. Discussion of method should be tied to enquiry into problems, because the test of a method is its success in solving problems. Criminal trial of animals is a problem which will serve to test a method. So some preliminary remarks on the method will be made.