A people’s history of leisure studies: a historiography of four traditions of critical leisure studies
A people’s history of leisure studies: a historiography of four traditions of critical leisure studies
复制标题
休闲研究的人民史：批判休闲研究四种传统的史学
DOI：
10.1080/14927713.2021.1874830
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Rasul A. Mowatt
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rasul A. Mowatt
最近，许多休闲研究领域的学术期刊都在呼吁发表论文，重点关注全球和特定国家的气候，这种气候倾向于专制政策的发展，法西斯言论成为常态，以及新自由主义哲学的更大扩张。一种批判性的休闲研究方法从休闲的起源和功能两个方面对休闲的建构进行了批判。这次讨论的目的是为休闲研究提供相反的、批判性的叙述。通过批判性话语分析和政治话语分析，阅读和分析了192篇关注休闲“批判性”的文本。这种分析产生了一种史学，它阐明了四个关键的替代或反传统：批判性休闲研究；新的休闲;Post-Leisure研究;和反休闲，这可以帮助休闲研究承担一个“新的”文化研究的角色。
ABSTRACT Recent calls for papers in numerous academic journals within leisure studies have focused on a global and nation-specific climate that leans towards autocratic policy development, fascist rhetoric as the norm, and a greater expansion of a neoliberal philosophy. A critical leisure approach critiques leisure studies and leisure research for what the construction of leisure is in its origin and in its function. The aim of this discussion is to present counter, critical narratives to leisure studies. Two hundred and ninety-two texts that focused on the ‘critical’ in leisure were read and analyzed through critical discourse analysis and political discourse analysis. The analysis resulted in a historiography that articulates four key alternative or counter traditions: Critical Leisure Studies; New Leisure; Post-Leisure Studies; and Anti-Leisure, which could aid leisure studies into taking on a role as a ‘new’ cultural studies.