An analysis and critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach
An analysis and critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach
复制标题
对设计研究的分析和批判：研究方法的形式化
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Forlizzi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Zimmerman;Erik Stolterman;J. Forlizzi
人机交互领域正在经历通过设计研究（RtD），一种研究方法，采用设计实践的方法和过程作为一种合法的调查方法越来越感兴趣。我们有兴趣扩展和形式化这种研究方法，并了解知识或理论是如何从这种类型的设计研究中产生的。我们采访了12位领先的人机交互设计研究人员，询问他们关于设计研究，设计理论和RtD的具体问题。他们能够很容易地从当代和历史的设计研究工作中识别出不同类型的设计研究和设计理论，并认为RtD可能是设计研究人员对更大的研究社区最重要的贡献之一。我们进一步研究了三个在访谈中反复提到的历史RtD项目，并对HCI研究和交互设计社区中当前的RtD实践进行了批判。虽然我们的评论总结了问题，它也显示了进一步发展和改进的方法可能的方向。
The field of HCI is experiencing a growing interest in Research through Design (RtD), a research approach that employs methods and processes from design practice as a legitimate method of inquiry. We are interested in expanding and formalizing this research approach, and understanding how knowledge, or theory, is generated from this type of design research. We conducted interviews with 12 leading HCI design researchers, asking them about design research, design theory, and RtD specifically. They were easily able to identify different types of design research and design theory from contemporary and historical design research efforts, and believed that RtD might be one of the most important contributions of design researchers to the larger research community. We further examined three historical RtD projects that were repeatedly mentioned in the interviews, and performed a critique of current RtD practices within the HCI research and interaction design communities. While our critique summarizes the problems, it also shows possible directions for further developments and refinements of the approach.
民族志被认为是有害的
DOI：
10.1145/1518701.1518835
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Crabtree A
通讯作者：
Crabtree A