Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: when people behave against their better judgment.
Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: when people behave against their better judgment.
复制标题
直觉和理性处理之间的冲突：当人们的行为违背了他们更好的判断时。
DOI：
10.1037//0022-3514.66.5.819
复制
发表时间：
1994
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Epstein,S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Denes-Raj,V;Epstein,S
在每次抽到一颗红色软糖的“赢”试验中，参与者都有机会赢得1美元，他们通常会选择从绝对数量较多但比例较小的碗中抽红豆（例如100分之7），而不是从红豆较少但几率较大的碗中抽（例如10分之1）。受试者报告说，尽管他们知道概率对自己不利，但他们觉得红豆越多，胜算就越大。在“输”试验中也得到了类似但不那么极端的结果，即抽到一颗红豆意味着输掉1美元。这些结果是根据认知-经验自我理论的具体原则和经验原则预测的。实验室中的非最优选择与对相关小片段的启发式反应和现实生活中自我报告的赌博行为显著相关。（PsycINFO数据库记录(c) 2016 APA，版权所有）
When offered an opportunity to win $1 on every" win" trial in which they drew a red jelly bean, Ss frequently elected to draw from a bowl that contained a greater absolute number, but a smaller proportion, of red beans (eg, 7 in 100) than from a bowl with fewer red beans but better odds (eg, 1 in 10). Subjects reported that although they knew the probabilities were against them, they felt they had a better chance when there were more red beans. Similar, but less extreme results were obtained on" lose" trials, where drawing a red bean meant losing $1. These results were predicted from the concretive and experiential principles of cognitive-experiential self-theory. Nonoptimal choices in the laboratory were significantly correlated with heuristic responses to relevant vignettes and with self-reported gambling in real life.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)