Tolerant, Classical, Strict
Tolerant, Classical, Strict
复制标题
宽容、古典、严谨
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
影响因子：
1.5
通讯作者：
R. Rooij
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Pablo Cobreros;P. Égré;David Ripley;R. Rooij
本文研究了R.货车Rooij解释了模糊谓词是宽容的这一思想，也就是说，解释了如果x是P，那么只要y与x足够相似，y就应该是P的原则。语义学利用无差异关系来模拟相似性，它依赖于三个真理概念的相互作用：经典概念，以及同时根据它定义的两个对偶概念，我们称之为宽容真理和严格真理。我们的特点是空间的后果关系定义的，并讨论了这种解决方案，这给了苏格拉底悖论。我们讨论了该框架在模糊谓词的语用学和心理语言学中的一些应用，特别是关于边界情况的判断。
In this paper we investigate a semantics for first-order logic originally proposed by R. van Rooij to account for the idea that vague predicates are tolerant, that is, for the principle that if x is P, then y should be P whenever y is similar enough to x. The semantics, which makes use of indifference relations to model similarity, rests on the interaction of three notions of truth: the classical notion, and two dual notions simultaneously defined in terms of it, which we call tolerant truth and strict truth. We characterize the space of consequence relations definable in terms of those and discuss the kind of solution this gives to the sorites paradox. We discuss some applications of the framework to the pragmatics and psycholinguistics of vague predicates, in particular regarding judgments about borderline cases.