Experimenting with a democratic ideal: Deliberative Polling and public opinion

Experimenting with a democratic ideal: Deliberative Polling and public opinion
复制标题

DOI:
10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500121
复制
发表时间:
2005-09-01
期刊:
影响因子:
1.2
通讯作者:
Luskin, RC
Luskin, RC
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fishkin, JS;Luskin, RC

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

事实证明,协商和政治平等的价值观很难同时实现。体现了两者的协商民意调查为协商民主提供了一个有用的窗口。研究结果回应了“失败主义者”、“减轻罪责论者”和“危言耸听者”的批评,表明普通人可以深思熟虑,他们会从中受益,而且这个过程既不会偏见也不会极化他们的观点。
The values of deliberation and political equality have proven hard to achieve simultaneously. Deliberative Polling, which embodies both, provides a useful window on deliberative democracy. The results, responding to 'defeatist,' 'extenuationist,' and 'alarmist' critiques, show that ordinary people can deliberate, that they benefit from doing so, and that the process neither biases nor polarizes their opinions.