METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN USING THE CHILD-BEHAVIOR CHECKLIST AND ITS RELATED INSTRUMENTS IN CLINICAL CHILD-PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH
METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN USING THE CHILD-BEHAVIOR CHECKLIST AND ITS RELATED INSTRUMENTS IN CLINICAL CHILD-PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH
复制标题
DOI：
10.1207/s15374424jccp2402_6
复制
发表时间：
1995-06-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
PERRIN, EC
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
DROTAR, D;STEIN, REK;PERRIN, EC
描述了儿童行为量表及其相关工具、教师报告表和青少年自我报告在临床儿童心理学研究中的应用问题。突出的问题包括：(A)确定不太严重的行为问题或低于骚扰阈值的行为问题水平变化的工具的灵敏度有限；(B)对社会能力的有限且可能具有误导性的评估；(C)在解释有关身体症状的数据方面可能存在偏见；(D)解释从不同文化、种族和经济多样性的样本获得的数据的困难；(E)使用工具的规范而不是对照组造成的问题；(F)将不同举报者之间的数据结合起来带来的困难；以及(G)评分的主观性。在临床儿童心理学研究中，研究者在收集、分析和解释数据时应该意识到这些问题。
Describes issues related to application of the Child Behavior Checklist and its related instruments, the Teacher's Report Form and Youth Self-Report in research in clinical child psychology. Salient issues include the following: (a) limited sensitivity of the instruments to identify less serious behavioral problems or changes in level of behavioral problems that are below the threshold for disturbance; (b) limited and potentially misleading assessment of social competence; (c) possible bias in interpreting data concerning physical symptoms; (d) difficulties of interpreting data obtained from culturally, ethnically, and economically diverse samples; (e) problems created by using norms for the instruments in lieu of comparison groups; (f) difficulties raised by combining data across informants; and (g) subjectivity in scoring. Investigators should be aware of these issues when collecting, analyzing, and interpreting data in clinical child psychology research.