FACILITATING INTERNALIZATION - THE SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY PERSPECTIVE
FACILITATING INTERNALIZATION - THE SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY PERSPECTIVE
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x
复制
发表时间：
1994-03-01
影响因子：
5
通讯作者：
LEONE, DR
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
DECI, EL;EGHARRI, H;LEONE, DR
自我决定理论（Deci & Ryan，1985）认为：（a）人们天生就有动机将对不感兴趣但重要的活动的调节内化;（B）这种内化可以通过两种不同的过程发生，从而导致不同的自我调节风格;（c）内化过程和调节风格发生的社会背景影响。内化的两种类型是内注和整合，内注是指接受一种价值或调节过程，但不把它当作自己的东西，而整合是指调节过程与一个人的核心自我意识同化。内投射导致内部控制调节，而整合导致自我决定。一项实验支持了我们的假设，即三个促进上下文因素，即，提供一个有意义的理由，承认对方的感受，并传达选择，促进内化，证明了随后的自我调节的行为。这个实验也支持了我们的预期，即当社会背景支持自我决定时，整合倾向于发生，而当背景不支持自我决定时，内向倾向于发生。
Self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985) posits that (a) people are inherently motivated to internalize the regulation of uninteresting though important activities; (b) there are two different processes through which such internalization can occur, resulting in qualitatively different styles of self-regulation; and (c) the social context influences which internalization process and regulatory style occur. The two types of internalization are introjection, which entails taking in a value or regulatory process but not accepting it as one's own, and integration, through which the regulation is assimilated with one's core sense of self. Introjection results in internally controlling regulation, whereas integration results in self-determination. An experiment supported our hypothesis that three facilitating contextual factors-namely, providing a meaningful rationale, acknowledging the behaver's feelings, and conveying choice-promote internalization, as evidenced by the subsequent self-regulation of behavior. This experiment also supported our expectation that when the social context supports self-determination, integration tends to occur, whereas when the context does not support self-determination, introjection tends to occur.