Resource dependence and community well-being in rural Canada.

Resource dependence and community well-being in rural Canada.
复制标题

加拿大农村的资源依赖和社区福祉。

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2004
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
T. Beckley
T. Beckley
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. Stedman;J. Parkins;T. Beckley

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

 资源依赖型社区居民的幸福感是农村社会学家的传统兴趣问题。“依赖资源”这一标签掩盖了这种关系在特定资源行业、地区或福祉指标之间的差异。很少有分析比较不同行业的福祉和资源依赖之间的关系,也没有测试关于资源依赖和福祉之间关系的竞争理论。我们的论文概述了资源依赖-农业,渔业,矿业,能源,林业-和加拿大人类福祉之间的关系。对1996年加拿大统计局数据的分析表明,“资源”依赖对福祉指标的影响有很大差异(例如,人力资本、失业、收入):一些行业表现出相当积极的结果(例如,农业),其他更负面的结果(例如,钓鱼)。与在美国进行的分析一致,这些关系因地区而异,这表明需要将地点和行业的具体情况纳入模型。
Abstract  The well-being of residents of resource dependent communities is a question of traditional interest to rural sociologists. The label “resource dependent” obscures how this relationship may vary between particular resource industries, regions, or indicators of well-being. Few analyses have compared the relationship between well-being and resource dependence across different industries, nor tested competing theories about the relationship between resource dependence and well-being. Our paper presents an overview of the relationship between resource dependence—agriculture, fisheries, mining, energy, forestry—and human well-being in Canada. Analysis of 1996 Statistics Canada data revealed a great deal of variation in the effect of “resource” dependence on indicators of well-being (e.g., human capital, unemployment, income): some industries exhibit fairly positive outcomes (e.g., agriculture), others more negative outcomes (e.g., fishing). Consistent with analyses conducted in the United States, these relationships vary by region, suggesting the need for models that incorporate the particulars of place and industry.