Response to Perrier and Charmantier: On the importance of time scales when studying adaptive evolution.

Response to Perrier and Charmantier: On the importance of time scales when studying adaptive evolution.
复制标题

对 Perrier 和 Charmantier 的回应:论研究适应性进化时时间尺度的重要性。

DOI:
10.1002/evl3.112
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
影响因子:
5
通讯作者:
Bosse M
Bosse M
中科院分区:
生物学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bosse M

文献摘要

相似文献

通过结合实地研究和基因组学的数据来推断适应和进化变化是进化生物学中一个令人兴奋的新领域,但也面临着挑战。当局部性状具有多基因结构时,这些挑战尤其尖锐,因为与对人类和模式生物的研究相比,许多长期的现场研究样本量有限,使得检测导致性状变异的基因座变得困难。在最近的一篇评论中,Perrier和Charmantier(2018);此后的P&C,强调了这些问题,并提请注意我们最近的出版物(Bosse等人)中描述的几个分析。2017)关于英国大山雀(Parus Main)种群较长喙长度的进化。虽然我们支持P&C的总体信息,即在从较短的生态时间序列对长期进化趋势做出推断时应谨慎行事,但我们也解决了P&C对Bosse等人(2017)中描述的分析提出的一些具体批评。宝洁的评论大致可以分为两组问题。第一种考虑表型变异是如何在空间和时间上分布的。第二部分探讨了选择性签名如何
Inferring adaptation and evolutionary change by combining data from field studies and genomics is an exciting new area in evolutionary biology but also presents challenges. These challenges are particularly acute when the focal trait has a polygenic architecture, because many long-term field studies are sample-size-limited compared to studies of humans and model organisms, making the detection of loci that contribute to trait variation difficult. In a recent comment, Perrier and Charmantier (2018); hereafter P&C, highlight these issues and draw attention to several analyses described in our recent publication (Bosse et al. 2017) on the evolution of longer bill length in UK populations of the great tit (Parus major). While we support the overall message of P&C–that caution should be exercised when making inferences about long-term evolutionary trends from shorter ecological time series–we also address some of the specific criticisms that P&C raised about the analyses described in Bosse et al.(2017). P&C’s comments can broadly be split into two sets of queries. The first considers how phenotypic variation is distributed in space and time. The second explores how signatures of selective