Bayesian estimation of the observation‐error covariance matrix in ensemble‐based filters
Bayesian estimation of the observation‐error covariance matrix in ensemble‐based filters
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/qj.2803
复制
发表时间:
2016-07
影响因子:
8.9
通讯作者:
G. Ueno;Nagatomo Nakamura
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
G. Ueno;Nagatomo Nakamura
We develop a Bayesian technique for estimating the parameters in the observation‐noise covariance matrix Rt for ensemble data assimilation. We design a posterior distribution by using the ensemble‐approximated likelihood and a Wishart prior distribution and present an iterative algorithm for parameter estimation. The temporal smoothness of Rt can be controlled by an adequate choice of two parameters of the prior distribution, the covariance matrix S and the number of degrees of freedom ν. The ν parameter can be estimated by maximizing the marginal likelihood. The present formalism can handle cases in which the number of data points or data positions varies with time, the former of which is exemplified in the experiments. We present an application to a coupled atmosphere–ocean model under each of the following assumptions: Rt is a scalar multiple of a fixed matrix (Rt=αtΣ, where αt is the scalar parameter and Σ is the fixed matrix), Rt is diagonal, Rt has fixed eigenvectors or Rt has no specific structure. We verify that the proposed algorithm works well and that only a limited number of iterations are necessary. When Rt has one of the structures mentioned above, by assuming S to be the previous estimate we obtain a Bayesian estimate of Rt that varies smoothly in time compared with the maximum‐likelihood estimate. When Rt has no specific structure, we need to regularize S to maintain the positive‐definiteness. Through twin experiments, we find that the best estimate of Rt is, in general, obtained by a combination of structure‐free Rt and tapered S using decorrelation lengths of half the size of the model ocean basin. From experiments using real observations, we find that the estimates of the structured Rt lead to overfitting of the data compared with the structure‐free Rt.