Improving the evidence base for delivery of public goods from public money in agri-environment schemes
Improving the evidence base for delivery of public goods from public money in agri-environment schemes
复制标题
DOI：
10.35241/emeraldopenres.13833.1
复制
发表时间：
2020-09
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Reed;P. Chapman;G. Ziv;G. Stewart;H. Kendall;Amy Taylor;D. Kopansky
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Reed;P. Chapman;G. Ziv;G. Stewart;H. Kendall;Amy Taylor;D. Kopansky
世界各地对更有效地将公共支付与提供农业公益物联系起来的兴趣日益浓厚。然而，已发表的证据综合表明，许多农业环境方案的证据好坏参半、薄弱或不确定。为了为今后任何基于“公共资金用于公益”的政策提供信息，需要开展进一步的综合工作，以评估目前在农业环境计划下供资的各种干预措施的证据基础。然后，进一步的实证研究和试验应侧重于证据混杂或有限的干预措施。此外，为确保收集的数据具有可比性并可有效综合，有必要就研究和监测人员可优先考虑的基本变量和方法达成一致意见。未来的政策可以将公共资金优先用于最可靠的公共产品，为纳税人提供更好的价值，并改善农业景观的生态系统服务。
There is growing interest around the world in more effectively linking public payments to the provision of public goods from agriculture. However, published evidence syntheses suggest mixed, weak or uncertain evidence for many agri-environment scheme options. To inform any future “public money for public goods” based policy, further synthesis work is needed to assess the evidence-base for the full range of interventions currently funded under agri-environment schemes. Further empirical research and trials should then focus on interventions for which there is mixed or limited evidence. Furthermore, to ensure the data collected is comparable and can be synthesised effectively, it is necessary to reach agreement on essential variables and methods that can be prioritised by those conducting research and monitoring. Future policy could then prioritise public money for the public goods that can most reliably be delivered, offering better value for taxpayers and improving the provision of ecosystem services from agricultural landscapes.