Reversal of Immunoparalysis in Humans In Vivo A Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Pilot Study

Reversal of Immunoparalysis in Humans In Vivo A Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Pilot Study
复制标题

DOI:
10.1164/rccm.201204-0645oc
复制
发表时间:
2012-11-01
影响因子:
24.7
通讯作者:
Pickkers, Peter
Pickkers, Peter
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Leentjens, Jenneke;Kox, Matthijs;Pickkers, Peter

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

原理:恢复脓毒症诱导的免疫麻痹可降低继发感染的发生率并改善结局。尽管IFN-γ和粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)恢复了脓毒症患者的离体刺激的白细胞的免疫能力,但对体内免疫麻痹的影响尚不清楚。我们在18名接受大肠杆菌内毒素治疗的健康男性志愿者中进行了一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机研究(LPS; 2 ng/kg,静脉内)。在第2、4和6天,受试者接受IFN-γ皮下注射,(100 μ g/天; n = 6),GM-CSF(4 μ g/kg/天; n = 6)或安慰剂(NaCl 0.9%; n = 6)。测量和主要结果:在安慰剂组,免疫麻痹表现为访视2期间LPS诱导的肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α血浆浓度降低60%(48-71%)(P = 0.03),而IL-10应答没有显著减弱(39% [2-65%]; P = 0.15)。相比之下,在IFN-γ组中,第2次访视期间TNF-α浓度未显著降低(28% [1-47%]; P = 0.09),而IL-10应答显著降低(降低54% [47-66%]; P = 0.03)。与安慰剂组相比,IFN-γ组访视2期间LPS诱导的TNF-α反应的降低显著较不明显(P = 0.01)。此外,与安慰剂相比,IFN-γ治疗增加单核细胞HLA-DR表达(P = 0.02)。GM-CSF的影响倾向于在相同的方向,IFN-γ,但没有统计学意义上与placebo.Conclusions相比:IFN-γ部分逆转免疫麻痹在人体内。这些结果表明,IFN-γ是一种有前途的治疗选择,以扭转败血症诱导的免疫麻痹。
Rationale: Reversal of sepsis-induced immunoparalysis may reduce the incidence of secondary infections and improve outcome. Although IFN-gamma and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) restore immune competence of ex vivo stimulated leukocytes of patients with sepsis, effects on immunoparalysis in vivo are not known.Objectives: To investigate the effects of IFN-gamma and GM-CSF on immunoparalysis in vivo in humans.Methods: We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study in 18 healthy male volunteers that received Escherichia coli endotoxin (LPS; 2 ng/kg, intravenously) on days 1 and 7 (visits 1 and 2). On days 2, 4, and 6, subjects received subcutaneous injections of IFN-gamma (100 mu g/day; n = 6), GM-CSF (4 mu g/kg/day; n = 6), or placebo (NaCl 0.9%; n = 6).Measurements and Main Results: In the placebo group, immunoparalysis was illustrated by a 60% (48-71%) reduction of LPS-induced tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha plasma concentrations during visit 2 (P = 0.03), whereas the antiinflammatory IL-10 response was not significantly attenuated (39% [2-65%]; P = 0.15). In contrast, in the IFN-gamma group, TNF-alpha concentrations during visit 2 were not significantly attenuated (28% [1-47%]; P = 0.09), whereas the IL-10 response was significantly lower (reduction of 54% [47-66%]; P = 0.03). Compared with the placebo group, the reduction in the LPS-induced TNF-alpha response during visit 2 was significantly less pronounced in the IFN-gamma group (P = 0.01). Moreover, compared with placebo, treatment with IFN-gamma increased monocyte HLA-DR expression (P = 0.02). The effects of GM-CSF tended in the same direction as IFN-gamma, but were not statistically significant compared with placebo.Conclusions: IFN-gamma partially reverses immunoparalysis in vivo in humans. These results suggest that IFN-gamma is a promising treatment option to reverse sepsis-induced immunoparalysis.