Biochemometrics for Natural Products Research: Comparison of Data Analysis Approaches and Application to Identification of Bioactive Compounds.
Biochemometrics for Natural Products Research: Comparison of Data Analysis Approaches and Application to Identification of Bioactive Compounds.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b01014
复制
发表时间:
2016-02-26
影响因子:
5.1
通讯作者:
Cech, Nadja B.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kellogg, Joshua J.;Todd, Daniel A.;Egan, Joseph M.;Raja, Huzefa A.;Oberlies, Nicholas H.;Kvalheim, Olav M.;Cech, Nadja B.
A central challenge of natural products research is assigning bioactive compounds from complex mixtures. The gold standard approach to address this challenge, bioassay-guided fractionation, is often biased towards abundant, rather than bioactive, mixture components. This study evaluated the combination of bioassay-guided fractionation with untargeted metabolite profiling to improve active component identification early in the fractionation process. Key to this methodology was statistical modeling of the integrated biological and chemical datasets (biochemometric analysis). Three data analysis approaches for biochemometric analysis were compared, namely, partial least squares loading vectors, S-plots, and the selectivity ratio. Extracts from the endophytic fungi Alternaria sp. and Pyrenochaeta sp. with antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus served as test cases. Biochemometric analysis incorporating the selectivity ratio performed best in identifying bioactive ions from these extracts early in the fractionation process, yielding altersetin (3, MIC 0.23 μg/mL) and macrosphelide A (4, MIC 75 μg/mL) as antibacterial constituents from Alternaria sp. and Pyrenochaeta sp., respectively. This study demonstrates the potential of biochemometrics coupled with bioassay-guided fractionation to identify bioactive mixture components. A benefit of this approach is the ability to integrate multiple stages of fractionation and bioassay data into a single analysis.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.1
作者:
El-Elimat T;Figueroa M;Ehrmann BM;Cech NB;Pearce CJ;Oberlies NH
通讯作者:
Oberlies NH
影响因子:
2.4
作者:
Martens, Harald;Bruun, Susanne W.;Kohler, Achim
通讯作者:
Kohler, Achim
影响因子:
4.9
作者:
KAATZ, GW;SEO, SM
通讯作者:
SEO, SM
影响因子:
4.1
作者:
Kulakowski, Daniel M.;Wu, Shi-Biao;Kennelly, Edward J.
通讯作者:
Kennelly, Edward J.
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
Inui, Taichi;Wang, Yuehong;Pro, Samuel M.;Franzblau, Scott G.;Pauli, Guido F.
通讯作者:
Pauli, Guido F.