Prospects of Studying the Meaning-Making Avoidance Coping
Prospects of Studying the Meaning-Making Avoidance Coping
复制标题
意义创造回避应对的研究前景
DOI：
10.23947/2658-7165-2023-6-4-81-88
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
E. Portnov
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Godunov;E. Portnov
导论.强调了研究意义制造回避应对归类为适应不良的重要性。回避型应对使人无法在交际情境中表现出适当的行为。在这篇文章中，我们将在方法论上证明原始问卷的结构，回避应对的部分语义差异的形式和一套个人特质量表包括在其中。我们描述了意义创造回避应对的基础和具体表现。这种策略包括远离问题，懒惰，粗心和不成熟的个性，留在舒适区的意愿，拖延，逃避现实，享乐主义，以及潜入虚拟空间。我们提出了我们的方法来研究回避应对的个人特质的部分语义差异的形式的细节。在设计时，我们从意义的和谐与不和谐现象出发，作为一种匹配与不匹配。最初的方法包括九个双极性的人格特质语义量表作为特殊的指示标记的意义。将对300名答复者进行验证。我们还将使用相关心理诊断领域的认证方法：D。a. Leontiev，Amirkhan的应对策略指标（CSI）由V. N。Yaltonsky和N. a. Sirot是由N. Grishina，墨尔本决策问卷改编T。V. Kornilova和T. V. Kornilova.我们相信，这个特别的方法将形成一套适合研究回避应对方面的测试。以人格特质结构的总体机制为基础，可以实证性地揭示回避型应对策略被试的价值意义领域的多类型画像。这些当前意义状态的多类型模型不仅在一个人的行为预测中是有效的，而且它们还意味着成本友好的测试技术。
Introduction. The importance of studying meaning-making avoidance coping classified as maladaptive is emphasized. Avoidance coping makes it impossible for one to behave adequately in the communication situation.Purpose. In this article, we will methodologically justify the structure of the original questionnaire for avoidance coping in the form of a partial semantic differential and a set of personal trait scales included in it.Theoretical Justification. We described the foundations and specifics of the expression of meaning-making avoidance coping. This strategy consists of shifting away from the problem, idleness, carelessness, and immaturity of the personality, the will to stay in the comfort zone, procrastination, escapism, hedonism, as well as diving into virtual space. We presented our method for studying avoidance coping specifics in the form of a partial semantic differential of personal traits. When designing it, we proceed from the phenomenon of meaning consonance and dissonance as a match and mismatch. The original method consists of nine bipolar semantic scales of personality traits as special indicator marks of meaning. The validation will be conducted on the sample of 300 respondents. We will also use certified methods from related psychodiagnostic spheres: “Life-Purpose Orientations” (LPO) by D. A. Leontiev, Amirkhan’s Coping Strategy Indicator (CSI) adapted by V. N. Yaltonsky and N. A. Sirot, the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI) adapted by N. V. Grishina, the Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire adapted by T. V. Kornilova, and the New Uncertainty Tolerance Questionnaire (NTQ) by T. V. Kornilova.Discussion. We are certain that this particular approach will form a battery of tests appropriate for study on avoidance coping aspects. It is possible to empirically reveal multi-type portraits related to the value-meaning sphere of subjects who show the avoidance coping strategy, if the ensemble mechanisms of personal trait structure are taken as a basis. Those multi-type models of current meaning states not only are effective in a person’s behaviour prediction, but they also imply cost-friendly test technologies.