Fatal mistake, awful mistake, or extreme mistake?: frequency effects on off-line/on-line collocational processing
Fatal mistake, awful mistake, or extreme mistake?: frequency effects on off-line/on-line collocational processing
复制标题
致命错误、可怕错误还是极端错误？：频率对离线/在线搭配处理的影响
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Suhad Sonbul
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Suhad Sonbul
本研究探讨了英语本族语者和非本族语者是否对语料库中同义形容词-名词搭配的频率敏感（例如，致命错误、严重错误和极端错误）以及熟练程度是否会影响这种敏感性。离线（典型性评级任务）和在线（眼动）的措施。离线实验结果表明，无论是本族语还是非本族语学生，对搭配频率都很敏感，随着熟练程度的提高，对非本族语学生的影响更加明显。在线，然而，熟练程度没有影响的频率敏感性，本地人和非本地人都表现出早期的敏感性搭配频率（首次通过阅读时间）。两组的这种在线敏感性在稍后的处理中消失（总阅读时间和注视计数）。结果进行了讨论，根据使用为基础的语言习得和处理的理论。
This study explored whether native speakers of English and non-natives are sensitive to corpus-derived frequency of synonymous adjective-noun collocations (e.g., fatal mistake, awful mistake, and extreme mistake) and whether level of proficiency can influence this sensitivity. Both off-line (typicality rating task) and on-line (eye-movement) measures were employed. Off-line results showed that both natives and non-natives were sensitive to collocational frequency with clearer effects for non-natives as their proficiency increased. On-line, however, proficiency had no effect on sensitivity to frequency; both natives and non-natives showed early sensitivity to collocational frequency (first pass reading time). This on-line sensitivity disappeared later in processing for both groups (total reading time and fixation count). Results are discussed in light of usage-based theories of language acquisition and processing.