Eye for Detail. Images of Plants and Animals in Art and Science, 1500–1630
Eye for Detail. Images of Plants and Animals in Art and Science, 1500–1630
复制标题
艺术和科学中的植物和动物图像，1500-1630
DOI：
10.1093/jhc/fhx004
复制
发表时间：
2017
影响因子：
0.2
通讯作者：
A. M. Roos
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. M. Roos
在做出这些断言时，Egmond的工作建立在Brian Ogilvie的学术基础之上，Brian Ogilvie指出，“过去的文艺复兴时期的自然史历史过度强调了自然史中的理论和哲学因素，特别是分类法和分类，而忽视了或将文艺复兴时期自然史的具体成就视为不言而喻的价值：认识到动物和植物世界的巨大多样性，建立一个从事共同事业的学者团体，并在这个团体中阐述发现新的自然物种并准确描述它们的方法”（《描述的科学：文艺复兴时期的欧洲自然史》，芝加哥，2006）。埃格蒙德近乎法医般的分析很好地阐明了精确描述16世纪自然物的视觉技术，包括图像分层、放大细节、放大插入和脱离语境的渲染。她还提出，视觉传统和对细节的兴趣是15世纪勃艮第酒的代表
In making these assertions, Egmond’s work builds upon the scholarship of Brian Ogilvie, who noted that ‘past histories of Renaissance natural history have overemphasized the theoretical and philosophical elements in natural history, particularly taxonomy and classification, while neglecting or treating as selfevidently worthwhile the specific achievements of Renaissance natural history: the recognition of the vast diversity of the animal and vegetable world, the establishment of a community of scholars engaged in a common enterprise, and the elaboration within that community of methods for discovering new natural kinds and describing them precisely’(The Science of Describing: Natural History in Renaissance Europe (Chicago, 2006). Egmond’s almost forensic analysis elucidates very well the visual techniques of precise description of sixteenth-century naturalia, including layering of images, zooming for detail, enlarged inserts, and decontextualized rendering. She also makes the suggestion that the visual tradition and interest in detail representative of fifteenth-century Burgundian