Erratum: Elastic constants and related properties of tetrahedrally bonded BN, AlN, GaN, and InN [Phys. Rev. B 53, 16310 (1996)]
Erratum: Elastic constants and related properties of tetrahedrally bonded BN, AlN, GaN, and InN [Phys. Rev. B 53, 16310 (1996)]
复制标题
DOI:
10.1103/physrevb.56.7018.2
复制
发表时间:
1997-09
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Kwiseon Kim;W. Lambrecht;B. Segall
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kwiseon Kim;W. Lambrecht;B. Segall
It was brought to our attention by Mark van Schilfgaarde1 that the values of the cubic shear moduli C44 c of GaN and InN calculated by us 206 and 177 GPa, respectively are significantly larger than the values obtained by him 142 and 79 GPa using the same full-potential linear muffin-tin orbital method but using an improved basis set including so-called local orbitals. 2 These allow one to include simultaneously the effects of semicore Ga 3d In 4d and high-lying conduction-bandlike Ga 4d In 5d states on the valence bands. At the same time, these improved calculations for zinc-blende AlN, GaN, and InN included semicore Al 2p, Ga 3p, and In 4p states, and used higher angular momentum cutoffs for the interstitial Hankel function expansions than our previous calculations. Here we present corrected values for the elastic constants of wurtzite AlN, GaN, and InN obtained by means of Martin’s transformation method using these more accurate cubic elastic constants as input in Table I.We find that the values of Ch h (C11 h C12 h)/2C33 h 2C13 h and C33 h obtained from the transformation are in better agreement with the directly calculated ones recalculated with our basis set than previously. This is not surprising, since C44 c is related to distortions along the cubic 111 direction which is equivalent to the distortions along the c axis determining C33 h and Ch h. We note that agreement with experimental data is comparable to that of our previous results. The improved calculations1 also affect the wurtzite structural parameters, shown in Table II, with a marked improvement compared to experiment for InN in the c/a ratio, and avoid the problems with dependence on the choice of muffin-tin sphere radii we discussed in our paper. The new values of C44 c also improve the ratios of C44 K/C44 in Table VIII, on p. 16 321. These become 0.84, 1.00, and 1.09, respectively, for AlN, GaN and InN. We finally point out the following misprints: the equation in the middle of the second