Quo vadis, analytical chemistry?
Quo vadis, analytical chemistry?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s00216-015-9148-6
复制
发表时间：
2016-01-01
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
Valcarcel, Miguel
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Valcarcel, Miguel
本文提出了一个开放的，个人的，新鲜的方法来分析化学的未来的背景下，深刻的变化，科学和技术预计将经历。它的主要目的是挑战年轻的分析化学家，因为我们科学学科的未来掌握在他们手中。对我们学科的过去和现在的不完全准确的整体概念的描述，应该避免，其次是分析化学及其基石的灵活，完整的定义（即，这些问题包括：目标和目的、质量权衡、第三种基本分析参考、信息等级、社会责任、独立研究、知识和技术转让、与其他科学技术学科的接口以及以良好为导向的教育。未来几年我们学科的框架可以从准确的一般和具体范式的描述中推断出来，同时考虑到过去错误的，过时的范式。最后，分析化学家的三个可能的反应，我们的学科的建议的变化进行了讨论。
This paper presents an open, personal, fresh approach to the future of Analytical Chemistry in the context of the deep changes Science and Technology are anticipated to experience. Its main aim is to challenge young analytical chemists because the future of our scientific discipline is in their hands. A description of not completely accurate overall conceptions of our discipline, both past and present, to be avoided is followed by a flexible, integral definition of Analytical Chemistry and its cornerstones (viz., aims and objectives, quality trade-offs, the third basic analytical reference, the information hierarchy, social responsibility, independent research, transfer of knowledge and technology, interfaces to other scientific-technical disciplines, and well-oriented education). The framework of our discipline in the coming years can be inferred from the description of the accurate general and specific paradigms taking into account the wrong, obsolete paradigms of the past. Finally, the three possible responses of analytical chemists to the proposed changes in our discipline are discussed.