Beyond Orthography and Phonology: Differences between Inflections and Derivations
Beyond Orthography and Phonology: Differences between Inflections and Derivations
复制标题
超越正字法和音系学：屈折变化和派生之间的差异
DOI：
10.1006/jmla.1994.1021
复制
发表时间：
1994
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
L. Feldman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
L. Feldman
摘要 使用塞尔维亚语材料研究了两种类型的单词识别任务中形态结构的影响。形态结构包括屈折和派生形式，并且根据词类以及形式的正字法和语音相似性来控制比较。在实验 1、2 和 3 中，在重复启动任务中，在形态相关的启动之后检查了目标决策延迟的促进模式。尽管所有形态相关的素数相对于未引发的条件都有利于目标，但屈折相关的素数比派生相关的素数产生的效果明显更大。在实验 4、5 和 6 中，受试者被要求将下划线部分从一个单词分割并移动到第二个单词，并大声说出结果。移位的字母序列有时是语素的（例如，相当于 DRUMMER 中的 ER），有时则不是（例如，相当于 SUMMER 中的 ER）。当词素字母序列是屈折词缀时，其分割和移动速度比非词素对照更快，但当它们是派生词缀时则不然。这些结果表明（a）形态效应不能归因于拼写和语音结构，（b）单词的构成语素结构有助于单词识别，（c）语素结构对于屈折形式比派生形式更透明。
Abstract The influence of morphological structure was investigated in two types of word recognition tasks with Serbian materials. Morphological structure included both inflectional and derivational formations and comparisons were controlled for word class and the orthographic and phonological similarity of forms. In Experiments 1, 2, and 3, the pattern of facilitation to target decision latencies was examined following morphologically-related primes in a repetition priming task. Although all morphologically related primes facilitated targets relative to an unprimed condition, inflectionally related primes produced significantly greater effects than did derivationally related primes. In Experiments 4, 5, and 6 subjects were required to segment and shift an underlined portion from one word onto a second word and to name the result aloud. The shifted letter sequence was sometimes morphemic (e.g., the equivalent of ER in DRUMMER) and sometimes not (e.g., the equivalent of ER in SUMMER). Morphemic letter sequences were segmented and shifted more rapidly than their nonmorphemic controls when they were inflectional affixes but not when they were derivational affixes. These results indicate that (a) morphological effects cannot be ascribed to orthographic and phonological structure, (b) the constituent morphemic structure of a word contributes to word recognition and (c) morphemic structure is more transparent for inflectional than for derivational formations.
重复启动的起源并不纯粹是偶然的。
DOI：
10.1037//0278-7393.13.4.573
发表时间：
1987
期刊：
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子：
--
作者：
Feldman,LB;Moskovljević,J
通讯作者：
Moskovljević,J