Conference grading of computer programs
Conference grading of computer programs
复制标题
计算机程序分级会议
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1987
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Ernest Ferguson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ernest Ferguson
CSI课程中的两种计算机科学课程评分方法从（1）对学生的益处，（2）对教师的优势和（3）剽窃方面进行了评估。比较的两种方法是会议评分和使用书面意见评分。
结果表明，学生认为评分是更公平的评分时，一对一的会议比评分时，书面意见。导师要求的时间，也差不多。在这段时间里，口头交流比书面交流多。在由会议评分的程序中，剽窃行为较少，而那些由会议评分的程序的学生在编程测试中的表现要比那些由书面评论评分的学生好。两组笔试成绩无显著性差异。
Two methods of grading computer science programs in a CSI course were evaluated in terms of (1) benefit to the student, (2) advantages for the instructor and (3) plagiarism. The two methods compared were conference grading and grading using written comments.
Results indicate that students thought the grading was more fair when graded by one-on-one conference than when graded with written comments. The time required by the instructor was nearly the same. More was communicated orally in this time than in writing. There was less plagiarism in programs graded by conference, and the students whose programs had been graded by conference performed better on a programming test than those who had their programs graded by written comments. There was no significant difference between the two groups on the written examinations.